That's a big no on NAT. We're still deploying them on the edge, feeding customer facing FTTH and DSL customers. At least they support EIGRP (yes we still use that) and MPLS. I really wish they would do some more development for the platform, or at least fix all the 'wierd-ness' on them.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 3:09 PM Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 4/3/22 20:30, Gert Doering wrote: > > > Netflow is sort of semi-supported, if I remember right - by using > > the SPAN feature of the chip to siphon traffic off to the CPU, and > > do netflow there, capped to 1GE of traffic. Or something like that. > > > > Did not try NAT or PPPoE on that box... but I'm sure there is excitement. > > > > (Speaking of SPAN - trying to debug BGP using a local SPAM is a real > > adventure, as packets sent by the local CPU are not seen on a RX/TX > > mirror session... only the RSTs coming in from the other end gave a > > clue what happened) > > We are finding the ASR920 has reached its usefulness for us. > > We are looking at other options now; and yes, from me, that also > includes boxes shipping with Broadcom :-\... > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
