On 7/15/22 07:56, Saku Ytti wrote:
Juniper is coming up with licensing but have strategically decided not to do technical enforcement. I am not against licensing wholesale, but I want it to be a commercial problem, not a technical one. I'm fine calling home and reporting non-compliance.
Agreed, I also like the Juniper model. The licensing is more commercial and support, than technical (except for PPPoE session scaling in BNG applications, IIRC).
But like Charles, we are also doing less and less work on Cisco. The last time we did an IOS XE upgrade on the ASR1002-X and ASR1006, it was anywhere between 21 - 42 steps to move from 3.x to 17.x :-(.
Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
