Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: hw failure CM 8.6.2 (Abdul Salam .)
2. CM AD integration....... (Scott Voll)
3. Re: CM AD integration....... (Blake Pfankuch)
4. Re: hw failure CM 8.6.2 (Nicholas Samios)
5. Re: hw failure CM 8.6.2 (Nathan Reeves)
6. UCCX 8 Callback (Louis Koekemoer (ZA))
7. Re: UCCX 8 Callback (Tanner Ezell)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:05:10 +0530
From: "Abdul Salam ." <[email protected]>
To: Mike King <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] hw failure CM 8.6.2
Message-ID:
<cakav0xqybqg0bnr7+v8issvwjx5viyvurto86mxmp+cvwb0...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
may be related to hardware or hardware monitoring agent.
*---AS*
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Mike King <[email protected]> wrote:
> Personally, I'd lead off with a Web open TAC case. Maybe it's cosmetic,
> but it might be something new, and your the first to hit it.
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Scott Voll <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I got a RTMT message over the weekend:
>>
>> At Sat Nov 24 03:00:57 PST 2012 on node , the following HardwareFailure
>> events generated:
>>
>> hwStringMatch : Nov 24 03:00:48 CMSUB daemon 4 Director Agent:
>> LSIESG_AlertIndication 500605B001890650 Consistency Check inconsistency
>> logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev: 3.
>>
>> AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent
>>
>> ClusterID :
>>
>> NodeID : CMSUB
>>
>> TimeStamp : Sat Nov 24 03:00:48 PST 2012
>>
>>
>>
>> hwStringMatch : Nov 24 03:00:48 CMSUB daemon 4 Director Agent:
>> LSIESG_StorageVolume_Modified 500605B001890650 Consistency Check
>> inconsistency logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev:
>> 3.
>>
>> AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent
>>
>> ClusterID :
>>
>> NodeID : CMSUB
>>
>> TimeStamp : Sat Nov 24 03:00:49 PST 2012
>>
>>
>> What is this all about? we just upgraded to 8.6.2. is this cosmetic or
>> more of a problem? do I need to open a TAC case?
>>
>>
>> TIA
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121127/bc9a2104/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:06:32 -0800
From: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CM AD integration.......
Message-ID:
<CAHgd+3-UPk4tfMOPDuc=jecx9drkz1ffm8wa0ppuwahsgpx...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
we are running CM 8.6.2.
our Server team is in the process of upgrading there last AD server to
windows 2012 from 2003. All other AD servers are 2008r2. They say they are
not upgrading the AD structure from 2003, but since this is the last server
to upgrade I'm concerned that it may upgrade the AD structure to 2008 or a
mix of 2008 / 2012.
according to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/8_6_1/ccmsys/a04direc.htmlit
looks like I should be OK with either AD 2003 or 2008, but if anything
happens with 2012, I'm guessing I'm hosed?
Any experience or other links would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121126/7cb0a2b5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:16:26 +0000
From: Blake Pfankuch <[email protected]>
To: Scott Voll <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM AD integration.......
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
It should stay at 2008 or 2008 R2 native. They should not be able to up to
2012 Native with the 2008R2 DC's still in production. They might be able to do
2012 Mixed mode, but usually that is a conscious choice. I am actually
spinning up a test 2012 server right now, and I can take a look to confirm.
Blake Pfankuch
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Cisco, Microsoft, Adtran and VMware Certification Information available upon
request.
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Voll
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 12:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] CM AD integration.......
we are running CM 8.6.2.
our Server team is in the process of upgrading there last AD server to windows
2012 from 2003. All other AD servers are 2008r2. They say they are not
upgrading the AD structure from 2003, but since this is the last server to
upgrade I'm concerned that it may upgrade the AD structure to 2008 or a mix of
2008 / 2012.
according to
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/8_6_1/ccmsys/a04direc.html
it looks like I should be OK with either AD 2003 or 2008, but if anything
happens with 2012, I'm guessing I'm hosed?
Any experience or other links would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Scott
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121126/524b8a20/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 05:44:36 +0000
From: Nicholas Samios <[email protected]>
To: "Abdul Salam ." <[email protected]>, Mike King <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] hw failure CM 8.6.2
Message-ID:
<d96e7b682f2065479ed12359e4756a6c24f5d...@isd-anx-dag1.win2k.iinet.net.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is this an MCS (IBM OEM) deployment? - I see mention of Director Agent
Reads like just a logging issue but TAC will confirm
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Abdul Salam .
Sent: Tuesday, 27 November 2012 5:35 AM
To: Mike King
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] hw failure CM 8.6.2
may be related to hardware or hardware monitoring agent.
---AS
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Mike King
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Personally, I'd lead off with a Web open TAC case. Maybe it's cosmetic, but it
might be something new, and your the first to hit it.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Scott Voll
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I got a RTMT message over the weekend:
At Sat Nov 24 03:00:57 PST 2012 on node , the following HardwareFailure events
generated:
hwStringMatch : Nov 24 03:00:48 CMSUB daemon 4 Director Agent:
LSIESG_AlertIndication 500605B001890650 Consistency Check inconsistency logging
disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev: 3.
AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent
ClusterID :
NodeID : CMSUB
TimeStamp : Sat Nov 24 03:00:48 PST 2012
hwStringMatch : Nov 24 03:00:48 CMSUB daemon 4 Director Agent:
LSIESG_StorageVolume_Modified 500605B001890650 Consistency Check inconsistency
logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev: 3.
AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent
ClusterID :
NodeID : CMSUB
TimeStamp : Sat Nov 24 03:00:49 PST 2012
What is this all about? we just upgraded to 8.6.2. is this cosmetic or more
of a problem? do I need to open a TAC case?
TIA
Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121127/545c3c8d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:43:59 +0800
From: Nathan Reeves <[email protected]>
To: Nicholas Samios <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] hw failure CM 8.6.2
Message-ID:
<cafi9pdp3tae7vdausf98l-s3kzm1de7nf-htquddqa1mpp6...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
As others have said, appears to be an error regarding disks on your server.
The mention of LSI and VD would suggest its the raid virtual disk
reporting this error. TAC case it.
Nathan
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012, Nicholas Samios wrote:
> Is this an MCS (IBM OEM) deployment? ? I see mention of Director Agent **
> **
>
> ** **
>
> Reads like just a logging issue but TAC will confirm****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>] *On Behalf Of *Abdul Salam .
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 27 November 2012 5:35 AM
> *To:* Mike King
> *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] hw failure CM 8.6.2****
>
> ** **
>
> may be related to hardware or hardware monitoring agent.****
>
>
>
>
> *---AS*
>
>
>
> ****
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Mike King
> <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>>
> wrote:****
>
> Personally, I'd lead off with a Web open TAC case. Maybe it's cosmetic,
> but it might be something new, and your the first to hit it.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Scott Voll
> <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');>>
> wrote:****
>
> I got a RTMT message over the weekend:****
>
> ** **
>
> At Sat Nov 24 03:00:57 PST 2012 on node , the following HardwareFailure
> events generated: ****
>
> hwStringMatch : Nov 24 03:00:48 CMSUB daemon 4 Director Agent:
> LSIESG_AlertIndication 500605B001890650 Consistency Check inconsistency
> logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev: 3. ****
>
> AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent ****
>
> ClusterID : ****
>
> NodeID : CMSUB ****
>
> TimeStamp : Sat Nov 24 03:00:48 PST 2012 ****
>
> ****
>
> hwStringMatch : Nov 24 03:00:48 CMSUB daemon 4 Director Agent:
> LSIESG_StorageVolume_Modified 500605B001890650 Consistency Check
> inconsistency logging disabled on VD 00/0 (too many inconsistencies) Sev:
> 3. ****
>
> AppID : Cisco Syslog Agent ****
>
> ClusterID : ****
>
> NodeID : CMSUB ****
>
> TimeStamp : Sat Nov 24 03:00:49 PST 2012****
>
> ** **
>
> What is this all about? we just upgraded to 8.6.2. is this cosmetic or
> more of a problem? do I need to open a TAC case?****
>
> ** **
>
> TIA****
>
> ** **
>
> Scott****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121127/d322704b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:14:20 +0000
From: "Louis Koekemoer (ZA)" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8 Callback
Message-ID:
<3bd7d37efe87f747a899371ddeadf48e084e6...@zabrysvexmb01.af.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hi all,
I recently upgraded a customer from UCCX 7 to UCCX 8.5. Previously the customer
had one Pilot number that the reps would call and after a brief prompt it would
end the call and proceed with a Callback to the rep. This was accomplished by
referring to some info in a SQL database. I do not know SQL that well, but now
have to provide a similar solution on the UCCX 8.5. Is there any chance anyone
has a sample script that could do something similar or could point me in the
right direction?
Regards
Louis Koekemoer
Principal Systems Engineer: Converged Communications
Dimension Data
Tel: +27 (11) 575 6560
Mobile: +27 (71) 680 8790
Fax: +27 (11) 576 6560
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Planned Travel -
Planned Leave - 01/12/2012 - 06/01/2013
For more information about Dimension Data, please go to
www.dimensiondata.com<http://www.dimensiondata.com/>
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
"http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer";
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121127/7cf3e991/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:20:22 -0700
From: Tanner Ezell <[email protected]>
To: "Louis Koekemoer (ZA)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8 Callback
Message-ID:
<cadserby3xva85ap1r5a+hannua36kmj0edkxo-31pm13qzq...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Is there a reason you cannot use the same script while making any changes
necessary to bring it up to compatibility with the 8.x platform?
Callbacks aren't very complicated and can be handled in a variety of ways
depending on the requirements and environment, you should be able to use
the original script as your guide.
Tanner
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Louis Koekemoer (ZA) <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> I recently upgraded a customer from UCCX 7 to UCCX 8.5. Previously the
> customer had one Pilot number that the reps would call and after a brief
> prompt it would end the call and proceed with a Callback to the rep. This
> was accomplished by referring to some info in a SQL database. I do not know
> SQL that well, but now have to provide a similar solution on the UCCX 8.5.
> Is there any chance anyone has a sample script that could do something
> similar or could point me in the right direction? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards****
>
> ** **
>
> *Louis Koekemoer*
>
> Principal Systems Engineer: Converged Communications****
>
> Dimension Data****
>
> Tel: +27 (11) 575 6560****
>
> Mobile: +27 (71) 680 8790****
>
> Fax: +27 (11) 576 6560****
>
> [email protected]****
>
> Planned Travel ?****
>
> Planned Leave - 01/12/2012 ? 06/01/2013****
>
> For more information about Dimension Data, please go to
> www.dimensiondata.com****
>
> P *Please consider the environment before printing this email* ****
>
> ** **
>
>
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
> "http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer";<http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20121127/a9e56cea/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 109, Issue 23
*******************************************
