Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: 2 stage inbound to FXO port issues (ccieid1ot)
2. OT: clause for local & long distance voice quality
(Lelio Fulgenzi)
3. P2V CUCM 8.5.1 (Michael Hamann)
4. unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange server
versions (Jefflin Choi)
5. Re: unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange server
versions (Jefflin Choi)
6. BAT CUCM 8.6 and 6.1 removing user groups from End user
(Collins, Matt)
7. Re: unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange server
versions (Klaczko, Edwin)
8. analog auto-attendant boxes? (Lelio Fulgenzi)
9. Jabber for windows hard time (Carlos G Mendioroz)
10. Re: unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange server
versions (Nate VanMaren)
11. pointers to the basic AA tcl script I can use with SRST
(Lelio Fulgenzi)
12. Re: P2V CUCM 8.5.1 (Ryan Ratliff)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 10:49:05 -0800
From: ccieid1ot <[email protected]>
To: Jeffrey Girard <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 2 stage inbound to FXO port issues
Message-ID:
<CAPRQTQNUKpQcuVhr-ydcX1KnPweWLBJWwzs+6LRvbx=0lil...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
For calls inbound to FXO ports, you would need to configure connection plar.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Jeffrey Girard <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Simplified diagram is attached. Lab network.
>
> Scenario: Using a 2811 router as a PSTN emulator. Has a 2 port FXS
> card installed. One port has an analog phone attached, other port is
> connected to a 4 port FXO card installed into a 2951 router. 2951 is H323
> with CUCM 8.6. Simple/test dial peers configured. Snippets below:
>
> PSTN Emulator:
>
> !
>
> voice-port 0/0/0
>
> !
>
> voice-port 0/0/1
>
> !
>
> !
>
> !
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>
> description Emulating legacy PATCOM number
>
> destination-pattern 0999
>
> port 0/0/1
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 2 pots
>
> description Emulating tie line to Access Terminal
>
> destination-pattern 9999
>
> port 0/0/0
>
> H323 Gateway Router
>
> !
>
> voice-port 0/1/0
>
> trunk-group FXO
>
> cptone PK
>
> !
>
> voice-port 0/1/1
>
> trunk-group FXO
>
> cptone PK
>
> !
>
> voice-port 0/1/2
>
> trunk-group FXO
>
> cptone PK
>
> !
>
> voice-port 0/1/3
>
> trunk-group FXO
>
> cptone PK
>
> !
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 1 pots
>
> description Incoming Call Routing
>
> incoming called-number .
>
> direct-inward-dial
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 2 voip
>
> description Incoming Call Routing
>
> incoming called-number .
>
> voice-class codec 1
>
> dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
>
> no vad
>
> !
>
> !
> voice-port 0/1/0
> trunk-group FXO
> cptone PK
> !
> voice-port 0/1/1
> trunk-group FXO
> cptone PK
> !
> voice-port 0/1/2
> trunk-group FXO
> cptone PK
> !
> voice-port 0/1/3
> trunk-group FXO
> cptone PK
> !
>
> !
>
> dial-peer voice 999 pots
>
> description Dummy dial peer to test BYOPBX
>
> destination-pattern 0999
>
> port 0/1/0
>
> forward-digits all
>
> !
>
> I have other dial-peers on this router (not shown) that will take the
> inbound digits. However, Im never able to pass the digits.
>
> Calls from the VoIP network to the simulated PSTN work fine. Calls from
> the PSTN to the VoIP network fail.
>
> When I pick up the analog phone, I get the expected dial tone. I enter
> "9999" and the call rings to the FXS port and I hear the FXO port answer.
> I get the expected secondary (2 stage) dial tone, but then before I can
> press any digits, the FXo port hangs up and I am left with the PSTN router
> dial tone.
>
> debug voip dialpeer on the H323 router shows no results at all when I
> try to place the call.
>
> debug voip dialpeer on the PSTN router shows the expected dial peer
> matching and the expected result. File is attached.
>
> Additionally, when I observe the output of show voice port summary while
> I place the call, I see the FXS port (the one that is tied to the FXO port)
> go off hook and then go back on hook (file also attached)
>
> So, the FXO port appears to be looking for something from the FXS when
> it answers the call, doesnt get it (or doesnt like what it gets) so it
> hangs up.
>
> Looking for help...
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
--
duy
CCIE #27737 Voice
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130226/3d92829e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:52:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: voip puck <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] OT: clause for local & long distance voice
quality
Message-ID:
<294414049.4877639.1361908376073.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
just wondering if anyone has any comments with respect to the quality of
service delivered by local and long distance service providers when requesting
quotes, etc.
i'd like to put something in to the effect of:
"Services must be of "toll quality" regardless of the time of day or transport
method selected by the service provider. Toll quality service is defined as a
receiving an Mean Opinion Score (MOS) of 4.0 or greater. "
thoughts?
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130226/28c06a70/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:15:05 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Hamann <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] P2V CUCM 8.5.1
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello,
we plan to migrate our productive CUCM 8.5.1 publisher running on a cisco
labeled IBM server to VMware 5.0 environment running on a spec cisco UCS system.
We have two subs (7825I) plus the publisher in the cluster. We heavily use
extension mobility with active directory integration.
We plan the migration for the next weekend. Our plan is so far:
- Backup all maschines
- Taking down pub + 1 sub
- Build a new publisher in a vm prepared with the right ova template. Same IP
etc...
- restore settings and files with drs
- rehost the license file from old license mac to the new one.
- after some checks - boot up the sub
- check db synchronisation
- done
Do we miss something ? Do we have to take care of the logged in extension
mobility user ? Will they still be logged in after a restore ?
Any hints appreciated...
Thank you
Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130226/ebd6bf55/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:15:42 +0800
From: Jefflin Choi <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange
server versions
Message-ID:
<caoadgqm6yf6x9wmstqqar+aajo0mehbuit2wmdkbnoksf87...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi All,
We have unity connection 8.5 currently integrated in exchange 2007 and
is working.
We however plan to migrate users on Exchange 2010 one by one and will
do it on parallel.
Emails are working when sending 2007 to 2010 and vice versa however we
couldn't have the single inbox functionality work.
The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
exchange 2007. Single inbox worked.
The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
exchange 2010. Single inbox worked.
Any suggestion how we could have the two servers work in parallel to
each other and have the single inbox functioning?
Anyone had done this before?
regards,
Jeff
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:27:45 +0800
From: Jefflin Choi <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity Connection - Single Inbox on two
Exchange server versions
Message-ID:
<caoadgqoajq90hxa+hr8_s5m-ajyzvjzrtxs_q85ikvauoej...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Trying to create a separate New Unified Messaging Service and migrate
each user one by one on unity. Hope it works. But if any better
options, i would appreciate it.
Thanks!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jefflin Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have unity connection 8.5 currently integrated in exchange 2007 and
> is working.
> We however plan to migrate users on Exchange 2010 one by one and will
> do it on parallel.
>
> Emails are working when sending 2007 to 2010 and vice versa however we
> couldn't have the single inbox functionality work.
>
> The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
> exchange 2007. Single inbox worked.
> The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
> exchange 2010. Single inbox worked.
>
> Any suggestion how we could have the two servers work in parallel to
> each other and have the single inbox functioning?
> Anyone had done this before?
>
> regards,
> Jeff
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:25:26 +0000
From: "Collins, Matt" <[email protected]>
To: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] BAT CUCM 8.6 and 6.1 removing user groups from
End user
Message-ID:
<693f4a831363c74fab2cf018128caa3484358fb...@erepex40.practice.linklaters.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All,
I'm trying to bulk update 200+ users to remove both the Groups within the
Permission information on the End User Configuration page, Currently assigned
with Standard End User and Standard CTI enabled.
I have tried lots of CSV formats to do had no luck. All updates fail saying
User Group : does not exist. and the user still has both groups assigned.
USER ID
USER GROUP 1
USER_1
< None >
USER_1
<None>
USER_1
< none >
USER_1
<none>
USER_1
#
USER_1
F
USER_1
f
USER_1
I created a Dummy Group with no roles to try and replace the one of the groups
but it just adds this group permission so then shows up with 3 groups, The
template I import then on has user group set to < None >.
Completely deleting the user and adding them back in is not a option as we are
LDAP sync'd
All I can find in the document is the ignore field using a special character
but wont help in this particular scenario.
Regards
Matthew Collins
Systems Management - IPT
Linklaters LLP,
* Work + 44 20 7456 2353
* Mobile + 44 7827 806 179
* [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
________________________________
Any business communication, sent by or on behalf of Linklaters LLP or one of
its affiliated firms or other entities (together "Linklaters"), is confidential
and may be privileged or otherwise protected. If you receive it in error please
inform us and then delete it from your system. You should not copy it or
disclose its contents to anyone. Messages sent to and from Linklaters may be
monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our
business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free.
Anyone who communicates with us by email is taken to accept these risks.
Linklaters LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and
Wales with registered number OC326345. It is a law firm authorised and
regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (www.sra.org.uk). The term
partner in relation to Linklaters LLP is used to refer to a member of
Linklaters LLP or an employee or consultant of Linklaters LLP or any of its
affiliated firms or entities with equivalent standing and qualifications.
Please refer to www.linklaters.com/regulation for important information on our
regulatory position.
A list of Linklaters LLP members together with a list of those non-members who
are designated as partners and their professional qualifications, may be
inspected at our registered office, One Silk Street, London EC2Y 8HQ and such
persons are either solicitors, registered foreign lawyers or European lawyers.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130227/78f02c66/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:45:59 +0000
From: "Klaczko, Edwin" <[email protected]>
To: Jefflin Choi <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity Connection - Single Inbox on two
Exchange server versions
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I went through this last summer. A new Unified Messaging Service is the only
thing that worked for me. You don't have to move each user one by one though,
you can use bulk administration. You can import the new UM service as you
migrate users. You will have to delete their old UM Service before you can
create new one though.
Eddie Klaczko
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jefflin Choi
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange
server versions
Trying to create a separate New Unified Messaging Service and migrate each user
one by one on unity. Hope it works. But if any better options, i would
appreciate it.
Thanks!
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jefflin Choi <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have unity connection 8.5 currently integrated in exchange 2007 and
> is working.
> We however plan to migrate users on Exchange 2010 one by one and will
> do it on parallel.
>
> Emails are working when sending 2007 to 2010 and vice versa however we
> couldn't have the single inbox functionality work.
>
> The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
> exchange 2007. Single inbox worked.
> The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
> exchange 2010. Single inbox worked.
>
> Any suggestion how we could have the two servers work in parallel to
> each other and have the single inbox functioning?
> Anyone had done this before?
>
> regards,
> Jeff
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:16:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: voip puck <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] analog auto-attendant boxes?
Message-ID:
<1983663216.4940087.1361974574388.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
anyone aware of any multi-line analog auto-attendant boxes that are available?
looks like we're out of luck with our AIM modules in two 3845s and I'm looking
at options to hold us over for a while after we upgrade to CUCM v9.
i've seen the viking one, but it's one port only and doesn't look like it can
transfer calls.
lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130227/0cc5df26/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:45:10 -0300
From: Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] Jabber for windows hard time
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Jabber demo setup, and it is diving me nuts.
Playing with Jabber 9.1.3 (under w7), and UCM/IM 9.1. Presence is fine,
desktop control is fine, but softphone is no go.
It seems I need a magic spell :)
Any known caviats I may be missing ?
What is the control protocol that Jabber tries to use ? CSF device shows
as SIP but I don't see any SIP activity :(
Advice, help, anything is welcome...
TIA,
--
Carlos G Mendioroz <[email protected]> LW7 EQI Argentina
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:57:41 +0000
From: Nate VanMaren <[email protected]>
To: Jefflin Choi <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] unity Connection - Single Inbox on two
Exchange server versions
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
If your exchange auto discover is working correctly, it should be able to just
figure out what server it needs to talk to depending on the users mailbox.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jefflin Choi
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] unity Connection - Single Inbox on two Exchange server
versions
Hi All,
We have unity connection 8.5 currently integrated in exchange 2007 and
is working.
We however plan to migrate users on Exchange 2010 one by one and will
do it on parallel.
Emails are working when sending 2007 to 2010 and vice versa however we
couldn't have the single inbox functionality work.
The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
exchange 2007. Single inbox worked.
The Unified Messaging Service ->Exchange Server is pointed to
exchange 2010. Single inbox worked.
Any suggestion how we could have the two servers work in parallel to
each other and have the single inbox functioning?
Anyone had done this before?
regards,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:47:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: voip puck <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] pointers to the basic AA tcl script I can use
with SRST
Message-ID:
<1345819755.4978931.1361983673759.javamail.r...@squeaky.cs.uoguelph.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Can anyone point me to the basic AA tcl script I can use with SRST? I'm going
to try and evaluate it as a possible short term alternative to this CUE module
mess we're in.
Thanks, Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (ANNU)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
- LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130227/c686ea79/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:54:25 -0500
From: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
To: Michael Hamann <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] P2V CUCM 8.5.1
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
There are two things that immediately jump out at me that are going to give you
ITL headaches.
1. You need to get the fix for CSCtn50405 before you move to vm.
2. You need to install the sub in VM before you do the DRS restore or its
certificates will not be restored and phones won't trust it.
-Ryan
On Feb 26, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Michael Hamann <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
we plan to migrate our productive CUCM 8.5.1 publisher running on a cisco
labeled IBM server to VMware 5.0 environment running on a spec cisco UCS
system. We have two subs (7825I) plus the publisher in the cluster. We heavily
use extension mobility with active directory integration.
We plan the migration for the next weekend. Our plan is so far:
- Backup all maschines
- Taking down pub + 1 sub
- Build a new publisher in a vm prepared with the right ova template. Same IP
etc...
- restore settings and files with drs
- rehost the license file from old license mac to the new one.
- after some checks - boot up the sub
- check db synchronisation
- done
Do we miss something ? Do we have to take care of the logged in extension
mobility user ? Will they still be logged in after a restore ?
Any hints appreciated...
Thank you
Michael
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130227/f5fe9b72/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 112, Issue 17
*******************************************
