Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Cisco EX90 work as standalone? (Nick Matthews)
2. Re: Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905 (Wes Sisk)
3. Re: Cisco EX90 work as standalone? ([email protected])
4. Re: 3905 doesn't show Calling Party Number on display during
ring-in (Wes Sisk)
5. Re: Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905 (Haas, Neal)
6. Re: Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905 (Wes Sisk)
7. Re: Call quality stats on SIP trunk? (Robert Kulagowski)
8. Re: 3905 doesn't show Calling Party Number on display during
ring-in (Jason Aarons (AM))
9. Cisco CUPs virtulized OVA templates (abbas Wali)
10. Gai-tronics RedAlert callbox analog with ATA-187 ?
(Jason Aarons (AM))
11. Re: Cisco CUPs virtulized OVA templates (Matthew Loraditch)
12. Re: Gai-tronics RedAlert callbox analog with ATA-187 ?
(Matthew Loraditch)
13. I need to unsubscribe from forum mailing list (ken thoma)
14. CIPC: Programatically change "Optimize for Low Bandwidth"?
(Dave Wolgast)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 12:00:22 -0400
From: Nick Matthews <[email protected]>
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" <[email protected]>
Cc: sheref hf <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco EX90 work as standalone?
Message-ID:
<cam-k-nomdzpyn0vkutnkfimvssazabid8jtg9mvpcoetche...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I've set up POCs with customers before without VCS or CUCM. Basically just
tell the unit there's no gatekeeper, assign a static address, and then dial
by IP addresses to the other units. I don't believe it will do URI dialing
without some sort of call agent though. This is obviously not a full
featured solution, but it can help when you're in a pinch.
-nick
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Chris Ward (chrward) <[email protected]>wrote:
> It can register to VCS or CUCM. The CUCM method is obviously a little
> more familiar to those who have CUCM experience. If you just have a VCS and
> an EX90 the process still isn?t what I would call complicated.****
>
> ** **
>
> Give this a read for VCS:****
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/admin_guide/Cisco_VCS_Administrator_Guide_X7-2.pdf
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> If it?s just a lab setup, then you should look at the section called
> ?Authentication using the Local Database?.****
>
> ** **
>
> +Chris****
>
> Unity Connection TME****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *sheref hf
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:02 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Cisco EX90 work as standalone?****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi friends,****
>
> ** **
>
> Have a nice day****
>
> Is the Cisco EX90 can work as standalone device or must register with VCS
> application ???****
>
> If so, How can I configure it???****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> BR,
> Sherif Ibrahim Moahmed
> Network Engineer
> CCVP, CCNP****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/1dde939b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:18:32 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>
To: Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
The new Bug Search Tool does not require selecting a product and has MUCH
better search capabilities:
And from those we can decipher that 39xx phones are under product Cisco Unified
IP Phone 6900 Series. Yes, it's illogical. That's part of why the new BST
doesn't require product.
Regards,
Wes
On May 28, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
wrote:
If you were looking for bugs with the 3905 in the Bugtoolkit what Product would
you pick in this screen shot attachment? I don?t see an option for 39xx.
<2013-05-28_085545.jpg>_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/9d13dd34/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PastedGraphic-3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 206887 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/9d13dd34/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 20:18:31 +0200
From: <[email protected]>
To: Nick Matthews <[email protected]>, "Chris Ward (chrward)"
<[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco EX90 work as standalone?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Thanks friends for your support
I have another question ... to use cisco EX90 .. how much bandwidth needed ...?
Is internet line with 2 Mbps enough or not?
BR,
Sherif Ibrahim Mohamed
Network Engineer
CCVP, CCNP
--- Sent from Samsung GN8000 ---
--- Original Message ---
From: "Nick Matthews" <[email protected]>
Sent: 28 May 2013 18:00
To: "Chris Ward (chrward)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "sheref hf" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco EX90 work as standalone?
I've set up POCs with customers before without VCS or CUCM. Basically just
tell the unit there's no gatekeeper, assign a static address, and then dial
by IP addresses to the other units. I don't believe it will do URI dialing
without some sort of call agent though. This is obviously not a full
featured solution, but it can help when you're in a pinch.
-nick
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Chris Ward (chrward) <[email protected]>wrote:
> It can register to VCS or CUCM. The CUCM method is obviously a little
> more familiar to those who have CUCM experience. If you just have a VCS and
> an EX90 the process still isn?t what I would call complicated.****
>
> ** **
>
> Give this a read for VCS:****
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/telepresence/infrastructure/vcs/admin_guide/Cisco_VCS_Administrator_Guide_X7-2.pdf
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> If it?s just a lab setup, then you should look at the section called
> ?Authentication using the Local Database?.****
>
> ** **
>
> +Chris****
>
> Unity Connection TME****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *sheref hf
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:02 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] Cisco EX90 work as standalone?****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi friends,****
>
> ** **
>
> Have a nice day****
>
> Is the Cisco EX90 can work as standalone device or must register with VCS
> application ???****
>
> If so, How can I configure it???****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks****
>
> BR,
> Sherif Ibrahim Moahmed
> Network Engineer
> CCVP, CCNP****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/95149db0/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:21:45 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>
To: Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 doesn't show Calling Party Number on
display during ring-in
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Maybe:
CSCty45240 On 3905 Calling party global number is not shown in call history
What do you consider "latest load" and what is displayed? This also sounds
suspicious:
CSCto57700 3905: Incorrect caller ID and call history of unknown number
-Wes
On May 28, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
wrote:
I noticed a 3905 with latest load doesn?t show the Calling Party Number on an
incoming call. Only the Calling Party Name displays. Is this a bug?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/9c70aa5a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 18:23:54 +0000
From: "Haas, Neal" <[email protected]>
To: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>, Jason Aarons
<[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905
Message-ID:
<3bfada3c46e5a4428c76dc87fcf5fade4a532...@cofmail03.intra.co.fresno.ca.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Currently in Beta when you have what they don't like.....
[cid:[email protected]]
Neal Haas
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wes
Sisk
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:19 AM
To: Jason Aarons
Cc: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905
The new Bug Search Tool does not require selecting a product and has MUCH
better search capabilities:
[cid:[email protected]]
And from those we can decipher that 39xx phones are under product Cisco Unified
IP Phone 6900 Series. Yes, it's illogical. That's part of why the new BST
doesn't require product.
Regards,
Wes
On May 28, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Jason Aarons (AM)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If you were looking for bugs with the 3905 in the Bugtoolkit what Product would
you pick in this screen shot attachment? I don't see an option for 39xx.
<2013-05-28_085545.jpg>_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/12b14ef1/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28806 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/12b14ef1/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 206887 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/12b14ef1/attachment-0003.png>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 14:44:16 -0400
From: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>
To: "Haas, Neal" <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Yep,
It's in Beta. We're working hard to bring bug search out of the 1980's and into
a more usable workflow. Feedback is welcome. We have hit some bumps along the
way. Still we, and most testers, think it's miles ahead of the original Bug
Toolkit.
Share your thoughts to help us get it right:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/online-tools/bugs
Regards,
Wes
On May 28, 2013, at 2:23 PM, "Haas, Neal" <[email protected]> wrote:
Currently in Beta when you have what they don?t like?..
<image001.png>
Neal Haas
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wes
Sisk
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 11:19 AM
To: Jason Aarons
Cc: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco Bugtoolkit 3905
The new Bug Search Tool does not require selecting a product and has MUCH
better search capabilities:
<image002.png>
And from those we can decipher that 39xx phones are under product Cisco Unified
IP Phone 6900 Series. Yes, it's illogical. That's part of why the new BST
doesn't require product.
Regards,
Wes
On May 28, 2013, at 8:57 AM, Jason Aarons (AM) <[email protected]>
wrote:
If you were looking for bugs with the 3905 in the Bugtoolkit what Product would
you pick in this screen shot attachment? I don?t see an option for 39xx.
<2013-05-28_085545.jpg>_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/f7b76c70/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:49:03 -0500
From: Robert Kulagowski <[email protected]>
To: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call quality stats on SIP trunk?
Message-ID:
<cage0w3s4rt8cdyxo0najqgbfsrf3zvbr7adkc8ukm+_hw2j...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Wes Sisk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Robert,
>
> My CUBE contact says:
>
> "sh call act voice is where is look first. Looking at the output below I do
> not
> see much diff. in Tx/Rx packet counts for the two leg. So that looks good.
> DSP stats are not relevant as for this call CUBE isn?t even going to touch
> the
> rtp payload (no xcoding/MTP in use.)
> A sniffer at the egress leg will give us lot in terms of evidence of what we
> are receiving and putting out on the wire.
>
> What exactly is the voice quality issue here? CPU checks out ok ?"
So now I've had my first "call sounded bad" issue with the SIP trunk,
but I want to make sure I understand what I'm looking at.
The leg that points at CM had this when the call ended:
P-RTP-Stat: PS=41299,OS=6607840,PR=33182,OR=5309120,PL=0,JI=0,LA=0,DU=826
Packet loss, jitter and latency are all 0. Great! But not.
The problem is that from the perspective of the phone / user, it
sounded bad. Pulling the stats from CM shows that the call had a MOS
of 2.6, and the user complained of it sound like it was "underwater".
PS (CUBE) is 41299, PR (Phone) 31139, loss of 10160 packets from
CUBE->Phone
PR (CUBE) is 33182, PS (Phone) 41315, loss of 8133 packets Phone->CUBE
So, plenty of packet loss. But how come the PL stat is "0"? Why isn't
specify something like PL-S and PL-R? Because the phone certainly
thinks there was packet loss, but that's not reflected in the
end-of-call stats on the CUBE.
Until I know why the discrepancy exists, I don't know that I can trust
the stats on the outbound call leg showing me "perfect" calls.
(But I also need to determine why I'm losing so many packets on the
inside network.)
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 20:25:30 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: Wes Sisk <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 doesn't show Calling Party Number on
display during ring-in
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d3551a...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Turns out it's a feature of the 3905 phone. If both Calling Party Name and
Number are sent only Name displays. :)
From: Wes Sisk [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:22 PM
To: Jason Aarons (AM)
Cc: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 3905 doesn't show Calling Party Number on display
during ring-in
Maybe:
CSCty45240 On 3905 Calling party global number is not shown in call history
What do you consider "latest load" and what is displayed? This also sounds
suspicious:
CSCto57700 3905: Incorrect caller ID and call history of unknown number
-Wes
On May 28, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Jason Aarons (AM)
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I noticed a 3905 with latest load doesn't show the Calling Party Number on an
incoming call. Only the Calling Party Name displays. Is this a bug?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130528/01bb6581/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:15:00 +0100
From: abbas Wali <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUPs virtulized OVA templates
Message-ID:
<CAFdHCp7ueDQFepND4A4pZNz0=W6upD=z-b74ruepmguduab...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
HI all,
I am trying to install CUPs 8.5/8.6 using cisco OVA templates in ESXi 5.
This is first time I am doing so. I understood that we dont need an ISO if
deploying an OVA template? is that correct.
I have tried many times and when it boots its just searches for an image on
the network. I have changed the boot sequence to use Harddrive and also
cdrom.
sounds like I am missing something Big time.
p.s. I have installed the ESXi inside vm workstation.
thanks
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130529/2f4138ec/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 08:14:57 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Gai-tronics RedAlert callbox analog with ATA-187
?
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d3551a...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
FXS in general has a lack of Supervisory Disconnect, that said has anyone
gotten a Gai-troncis RedAlert 393XX callbox to work with an ATA-187 registered
to CallManager?
Problem is you press the callbox button, the public safety answers and tells
you help is on the way. Public Safety hangs up and the callbox blairs out
re-order tone for 3-4 minutes. (You may recall a home phone left offhook will
play a loud re-order tone if you don't hang it up due to lack of Supervisory
Disconnect).
I found the ATA-187 parameter Reorder Delay = Never turns off the sounds, but
doesn't really hang up the phone. The ATA-187 has polarity reversal, does this
work with Gai-troncis callboxes?
In short can anyone say they have had success getting the Gai-tronics to work
with the ATA-187? Maybe there are some settings in the Gai-troncs device?
Page 36 doesn't get me much to work with
http://www.gai-tronics.com/manuals/42004-438i.pdf
I'm thinking the VG-2XX is the better way to go as it has more Supervisory
Disconnect options, but I can't guarantee that will work without testing it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130529/10626ae5/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:20:21 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: abbas Wali <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUPs virtulized OVA templates
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The OVA just creates the VM with the correct settings, you need a bootable ISO.
It is possible to deploy an entire VM with an OVA and Cisco uses that method
for some other products but not UC Apps.
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of abbas
Wali
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco CUPs virtulized OVA templates
HI all,
I am trying to install CUPs 8.5/8.6 using cisco OVA templates in ESXi 5.
This is first time I am doing so. I understood that we dont need an ISO if
deploying an OVA template? is that correct.
I have tried many times and when it boots its just searches for an image on the
network. I have changed the boot sequence to use Harddrive and also cdrom.
sounds like I am missing something Big time.
p.s. I have installed the ESXi inside vm workstation.
thanks
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130529/36148512/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:24:32 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>, "cisco-voip
([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Gai-tronics RedAlert callbox analog with
ATA-187 ?
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I have no experience with Gaitronics, but had a similar situation with a paging
interface. The ATA 187 wouldn't and couldn't (per TAC) issue the disconnect. We
had to use a VG202 instead.
HTH
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 8:15 AM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: [cisco-voip] Gai-tronics RedAlert callbox analog with ATA-187 ?
FXS in general has a lack of Supervisory Disconnect, that said has anyone
gotten a Gai-troncis RedAlert 393XX callbox to work with an ATA-187 registered
to CallManager?
Problem is you press the callbox button, the public safety answers and tells
you help is on the way. Public Safety hangs up and the callbox blairs out
re-order tone for 3-4 minutes. (You may recall a home phone left offhook will
play a loud re-order tone if you don't hang it up due to lack of Supervisory
Disconnect).
I found the ATA-187 parameter Reorder Delay = Never turns off the sounds, but
doesn't really hang up the phone. The ATA-187 has polarity reversal, does this
work with Gai-troncis callboxes?
In short can anyone say they have had success getting the Gai-tronics to work
with the ATA-187? Maybe there are some settings in the Gai-troncs device?
Page 36 doesn't get me much to work with
http://www.gai-tronics.com/manuals/42004-438i.pdf
I'm thinking the VG-2XX is the better way to go as it has more Supervisory
Disconnect options, but I can't guarantee that will work without testing it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130529/337a782d/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 06:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: ken thoma <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] I need to unsubscribe from forum mailing list
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130529/5064c34b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:07:43 -0400
From: Dave Wolgast <[email protected]>
To: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CIPC: Programatically change "Optimize for Low
Bandwidth"?
Message-ID:
<cahozw-259dxbnk-0rhy7ji7ruqv0wnpsxlyut0t-jbaskgz...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Getting ready to do MSI install of CIPC 8.6(3), and trying to figure out if
we can set "Optimize for Low Bandwidth" by default, maybe with a registry
setting or MSIexec flag.
Does anyone have any experience doing this?
--
Dave Wolgast
Livonia, NY
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130529/901979f7/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 115, Issue 28
*******************************************
