Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. #clus be at Dimension Data booth 5:30pm (Jason Aarons (AM))
   2. Re: #CLUS and #PUCK (Scott Voll)
   3. Re: #CLUS and #PUCK (Stephen Welsh)
   4. Cisco Federated Link & Jabber implementation (Thomas LeMay)
   5. Re: Outgoing cLI (Costas Georgiou)
   6.  translate called no (Shaihan Jaffrey)
   7. Re: #CLUS and #PUCK (Matthew Loraditch)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:50:41 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] #clus be at Dimension Data booth 5:30pm
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130624/7c839b43/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 09:04:32 -0700
From: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
To: Ed Leatherman <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] #CLUS and #PUCK
Message-ID:
        <cahgd+38ok3uloyt5fhxatpqxxkyahavjbrubezhjwzofcmr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Where r u?

On Sunday, June 23, 2013, Ed Leatherman wrote:

> Sounds good, nice hat
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:03 AM, "Jason Aarons (AM)" <
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
> I?ll look for an area in the lunch room we can meet up and tweet something
> via #CLUS #PUCK on Monday am.  I?ll bring the hat so you can spot me J****
>
> ** **
>
> Twitter Pic****
>
> http://t.co/yvacMtvpG2****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> '[email protected]');>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130624/3cbe5eb9/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:38:42 +0000
From: Stephen Welsh <[email protected]>
To: Scott Voll <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
        <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] #CLUS and #PUCK
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

Didata's stand 207?

Sent from my iPhone

On 24 Jun 2013, at 17:37, "Scott Voll" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Where r u?

On Sunday, June 23, 2013, Ed Leatherman wrote:
Sounds good, nice hat

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:03 AM, "Jason Aarons (AM)" 
<[email protected]<javascript:_e({},%20'cvml',%20'[email protected]');>>
 wrote:

I?ll look for an area in the lunch room we can meet up and tweet something via 
#CLUS #PUCK on Monday am.  I?ll bring the hat so you can spot me :)

Twitter Pic
http://t.co/yvacMtvpG2




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<javascript:_e({},%20'cvml',%20'[email protected]');>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130624/cff33b76/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:40:45 -0400
From: "Thomas LeMay" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cisco Federated Link & Jabber implementation
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi,

 

I am trying to help out a colleague and get some information and pros\cons
from anyone who has implemented or designed a Cisco Federated Link jabber
integration.  Any links or information would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Tom

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130624/f9bd3cfe/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:51 +0100
From: Costas Georgiou <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Outgoing cLI
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi all,

Just to let you know, the issue was with the route patterns, the "use calling 
parties external number mask" was not ticked.

Thanks for your help.

Regards

Cos

Sent from my iPhone

On 21 Jun 2013, at 15:44, Ryan Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote:

> In the first two the calling numbers are different, are either of those your 
> main number, or are they the number you expected to be sent?
> 
> -Ryan
> 
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 5:12 AM, costas georgiou <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The first two debugs are from an MGCP gateway which is only passing the main 
> number not the individual extension.  The last one is passing the correct 
> digits.  They are both outgoing,  all extensions are 7 digits.
>  
> un 21 08:27:26.254: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1B5C
>         Sending Complete
>         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
>                 Standard = CCITT
>                 Transfer Capability = Speech
>                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
>                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>         Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
>                 Exclusive, Channel 31
>         Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '02082696700'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
>         Called Party Number i = 0x80, '01212548185'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
> Jun 21 08:27:26.438: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 
> 0x9B5C
>         Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
>  
> 
> un 21 08:34:17.500: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 0x1B62
>         Sending Complete
>         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
>                 Standard = CCITT
>                 Transfer Capability = Speech
>                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
>                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>         Channel ID i = 0xA9839C
>                 Exclusive, Channel 28
>         Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '2036132'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
>         Called Party Number i = 0x80, '07825015577'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
> Jun 21 08:34:17.704: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 
> 0x9B62
>         Channel ID i = 0xA9839C
>                 Exclusive, Channel 28
> Jun 21 08:34:19.580: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 
> 0x1B63
> 
> ***********************************************************************
>  Working
> *Jun 21 09:19:09.201: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX -> SETUP pd = 8  callref = 
> 0x00CD
>         Sending Complete
>         Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
>                 Standard = CCITT
>                 Transfer Capability = Speech
>                 Transfer Mode = Circuit
>                 Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>         Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
>                 Exclusive, Channel 31
>         Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '02078223798'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
>         Called Party Number i = 0x80, '07976596466'
>                 Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
> *Jun 21 09:19:09.401: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX <- CALL_PROC pd = 8  callref = 
> 0x80CD
>         Channel ID i = 0xA9839F
>                 Exclusive, Channel 31
>  
> > From: [email protected]
> > Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:19:33 -0500
> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Outgoing cLI
> > To: [email protected]
> > CC: [email protected]
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:29 AM, costas georgiou <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I have an MGCP and a H323 gateway and I am trying to send out the correct
> > > number. When a call is made it sends out the main number i.e. receptions
> > > number rather than the users extension. CLI is enabled by the provider.
> > > The outbound call Calling party presentation is set to default and so is 
> > > the
> > > Route group. I have even amended that to Allow but still not sending the
> > > correct digits.
> > 
> > You said that you have both MGCP and H.323. Which gateway are your
> > outbound calls using?
> > 
> > Do a "debug isdn q931" and then a "term mon" and capture the output of
> > an outbound call.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130625/e2983cf0/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:28:10 +0500
From: Shaihan Jaffrey <[email protected]>
To: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip]  translate called no
Message-ID:
        <capxwygrdwxob6hgajnfdiofoojmeoky4lyvu9e+_vxt-o4p...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

i have a scenario where incoming calls through PSTN need to be translated
to a UK toll free number and going out thorough a SIP trunk provider.

Please let me know if the below mentioned config on Voice GW is Ok for this
purpose.





voice call send-alert



voice call carrier capacity active



voice rtp send-recv



!



voice service voip



allow-connections h323 to h323



allow-connections h323 to sip


allow-connections sip to sip


allow-connections sip to h323



!



sip


rel1xx disable


min-se  360


header-passing


!

!



voice class codec 10



codec preference 1 g711ulaw



codec preference 2 g711alaw



codec preference 3 g729r8



!



!



voice translation-rule 3



rule 1 /.*/ /12345/           ! ! !  12345 = UK number



!



!



voice translation-profile ITSP_Outgoing



translate called 1



!



!



!



voice-port 0/0/0



!



voice-port 0/0/1



!



voice-port 0/0/2



!



voice-port 0/0/3



!



!



dial-peer voice 111 pots


translation-profile incoming 1



incoming called-number .T



direct-inward-dial



port 0/0/0



!



!



dial-peer voice 1 voip



destination-pattern .T



voice-class codec 1



session protocol sipv2


session target ipv4:1.1.1.1    !!!!!!               ITSP IP


dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify h245-alphanumeric


no vad


!



!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130625/ec9a315e/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:18:06 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] #CLUS and #PUCK
Message-ID:
        <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

New game.. Where's Wes? I know he said he'd be in the tech clinic area but 
haven't found him yet

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Welsh [[email protected]]
Received: Monday, 24 Jun 2013, 5:40PM
To: Scott Voll [[email protected]]
CC: cisco-voip ([email protected]) [[email protected]]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] #CLUS and #PUCK

Didata's stand 207?

Sent from my iPhone

On 24 Jun 2013, at 17:37, "Scott Voll" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Where r u?

On Sunday, June 23, 2013, Ed Leatherman wrote:
Sounds good, nice hat

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 23, 2013, at 8:03 AM, "Jason Aarons (AM)" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

I?ll look for an area in the lunch room we can meet up and tweet something via 
#CLUS #PUCK on Monday am.  I?ll bring the hat so you can spot me :)

Twitter Pic
http://t.co/yvacMtvpG2




_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130625/22a10b5e/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


------------------------------

End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 116, Issue 24
*******************************************

Reply via email to