Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2 (Heim, Dennis)
2. Re: Cheap Router for 911 (Heim, Dennis)
3. Re: Cheap Router for 911 (Norton, Mike)
4. Re: Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2 (Peter Slow)
5. AW error -9986:Session to local database could not be opened
(Ryan Burtch)
6. Re: AW error -9986:Session to local database could not be
opened (shary shary)
7. Re: AW error -9986:Session to local database could not be
opened (Omar)
8. DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE (Alessandro Bertacco)
9. Re: DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE (Divin John (dijohn))
10. R: DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE (Alessandro Bertacco)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:27:03 -0500
From: "Heim, Dennis" <[email protected]>
To: Joe Martini <[email protected]>, Mike <[email protected]>
Cc: 'Cisco VOIP' <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks. I just saw it and was curious.
Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite.
From: Joe Martini [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:37 AM
To: Mike
Cc: Heim, Dennis; 'Cisco VOIP'
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
Dennis,
The recovery disk option is not a way around rebuilding since the recovery disk
warns that all data will be lost, thus a rebuild is still required.
[cid:[email protected]]
Joe
On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Mike <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Whats in 9.1.2 that makes this possible? I only have media for 9.1.1
From: Heim, Dennis [mailto:[email protected]<http://wwt.com>]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:49 PM
To: Mike ; 'Cisco VOIP'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
I just did a 5.1(3g) -> 6.1(5) -> 7.1(5) -> 9.1(1) not that long ago. It is not
a jump upgrade. I did try it to 9.1(2) at one point. It seemed to work, but you
have unaligned partitions. You would need to do drs backup and restore. I
noticed with the 9.1(1) recovery disk there is the option to align partitions.
I wonder if that is a way around rebuilding. I think a fresh backup and restore
at the end is a good measure anyway.
Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 3:29 PM
To: 'Cisco VOIP'
Subject: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
Couple questions.
I DMA'd to 7.1.5b on 7825 then DRS out to 7.1.5b in vmware .
Question is I don't have a bootable copy of 9.1.2 so I was going to upgrade
7.1.5 vm using non-bootable and do the fresh install with 9.1.1 with an upgrade
during install to 9.1.2.
Is this supported?
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/525af2ae/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 76188 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/525af2ae/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:31:10 -0500
From: "Heim, Dennis" <[email protected]>
To: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>, David Zhars <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cheap Router for 911
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
You are really looking for a provider to have Selective PSAP router, so that it
goes to the right PSAP on calling number. SIP providers are usually most
familiar with this.
Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite.
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:20 AM
To: David Zhars
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cheap Router for 911
ok, from what I understand, you don't have to _physically_ send the 911 call
over that line for things to work. you just need and address attached to the
number you're marking the calls with. here's how we do it.
* signed a waiver with our PSTN provider so they lift the filter and allow
us to mark outbound calls with ANY number
* signed up for a PS-ALI service with another provider so we can enter any
address for any DID
* DIDs are configured to ring through to our campus security
you can probably do the same with a 1FL installed at each building, and then
forward the calls to a DID that is answered by someone.
not perfect, but it might buy you some time.
not the answer you're looking for, but a different perspective.
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
________________________________
From: "David Zhars" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:10:04 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cheap Router for 911
Have a site with a 8 port 3560 router. Wired via fiber to another building
with UCM 8.0.
What's a cheap little router I can add to this site for 911? Not worried about
SRST, but proper address reporting for 911 would be nice!
My VAR is recommending the 2901 which looks like total overkill.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/c222f5fe/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:45:40 +0000
From: "Norton, Mike" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cheap Router for 911
Message-ID:
<2c4107b204f8e74eb0a63ef59b0f970212c28...@pwsdexchange06.pwsb33.ab.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Whether or not you can do this may depend on the terms of service with the
provider. I know with PS-ALI service from Telus, simply forwarding the DIDs to
?someone? is not sufficient. Their tariff document for PS-ALI service
specifically states that the DID must ring to the station that placed the 911
call.
--
Mike Norton
I.T. Specialist
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lelio
Fulgenzi
Sent: September-27-13 8:20 AM
To: David Zhars
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cheap Router for 911
ok, from what I understand, you don't have to _physically_ send the 911 call
over that line for things to work. you just need and address attached to the
number you're marking the calls with. here's how we do it.
* signed a waiver with our PSTN provider so they lift the filter and allow
us to mark outbound calls with ANY number
* signed up for a PS-ALI service with another provider so we can enter any
address for any DID
* DIDs are configured to ring through to our campus security
you can probably do the same with a 1FL installed at each building, and then
forward the calls to a DID that is answered by someone.
not perfect, but it might buy you some time.
not the answer you're looking for, but a different perspective.
Lelio
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs>
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
________________________________
From: "David Zhars" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 9:10:04 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] Cheap Router for 911
Have a site with a 8 port 3560 router. Wired via fiber to another building
with UCM 8.0.
What's a cheap little router I can add to this site for 911? Not worried about
SRST, but proper address reporting for 911 would be nice!
My VAR is recommending the 2901 which looks like total overkill.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/9d6cf5cc/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:16:31 -0400
From: Peter Slow <[email protected]>
To: Joe Martini <[email protected]>
Cc: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
...So, is there a particular scenario where the align partitions option
_should_ be used? I can't think of one, if it blows away all your info... It
must have been added for a reason, no?
Just curious,
-Pete
On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:27 PM, "Heim, Dennis" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks. I just saw it and was curious.
>
> Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
>
> PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite.
>
>
> From: Joe Martini [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: Mike
> Cc: Heim, Dennis; 'Cisco VOIP'
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
>
> Dennis,
>
> The recovery disk option is not a way around rebuilding since the recovery
> disk warns that all data will be lost, thus a rebuild is still required.
>
> <image001.png>
>
> Joe
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2013, at 9:54 PM, Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Whats in 9.1.2 that makes this possible? I only have media for 9.1.1
>
> From: Heim, Dennis [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:49 PM
> To: Mike ; 'Cisco VOIP'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
>
> I just did a 5.1(3g) -> 6.1(5) -> 7.1(5) -> 9.1(1) not that long ago. It is
> not a jump upgrade. I did try it to 9.1(2) at one point. It seemed to work,
> but you have unaligned partitions. You would need to do drs backup and
> restore. I noticed with the 9.1(1) recovery disk there is the option to
> align partitions. I wonder if that is a way around rebuilding. I think a
> fresh backup and restore at the end is a good measure anyway.
>
> Dennis Heim | Solution Architect (Collaboration)
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | 314-212-1814
>
> PS Engineering: Innovate & Ignite.
>
>
> From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Mike
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: 'Cisco VOIP'
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Jump upgrade: 4.1.3>7.1.5b > 9.1.2
>
> Couple questions.
>
> I DMA?d to 7.1.5b on 7825 then DRS out to 7.1.5b in vmware .
>
> Question is I don?t have a bootable copy of 9.1.2 so I was going to upgrade
> 7.1.5 vm using non-bootable and do the fresh install with 9.1.1 with an
> upgrade during install to 9.1.2.
>
> Is this supported?
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/6eb89cc1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:57:47 -0400
From: Ryan Burtch <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] AW error -9986:Session to local database could
not be opened
Message-ID:
<cak+shf6p1gijm6w+wh7ns6ebbr563o537vxmtzkkgwpt2w6...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
All:
I am trying to setup a Client AW with ICM 8.0, but everytime I run Config
manager, I get this error: AW error -9986:Session to local database could
not be opened.
I have already changed the SQL client to named pipes, but that hasn't
helped.
My client AW doesn't have any ODBC connections listed...not sure if that's
an issue or not.
I can't find anything significant on the instructions of setting up a
client AW in ICM 8.0, so help would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Ryan Burtch
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/22c9d927/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 00:05:56 +0000
From: shary shary <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Burtch <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AW error -9986:Session to local database
could not be opened
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Ryan,Please check the router logs if your AW is able to communicate with ICM
router. try to cycle the Router process and then check.
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:57:47 -0400
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] AW error -9986:Session to local database could not be
opened
All:
I am trying to setup a Client AW with ICM 8.0, but everytime I run Config
manager, I get this error: AW error -9986:Session to local database could not
be opened.
I have already changed the SQL client to named pipes, but that hasn't helped.
My client AW doesn't have any ODBC connections listed...not sure if that's an
issue or not.
I can't find anything significant on the instructions of setting up a client AW
in ICM 8.0, so help would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Ryan Burtch
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130928/0fe12672/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Omar <[email protected]>
To: Ryan Burtch <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] AW error -9986:Session to local database
could not be opened
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
You should definitely have ODBC connections - a list of them in fact.?
________________________________
From: Ryan Burtch <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 8:57 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] AW error -9986:Session to local database could not be
opened
All:
I am trying to setup a Client AW with ICM 8.0, but everytime I run Config
manager, I get this error:?AW error -9986:Session to local database could not
be opened.
I have already changed the SQL client to named pipes, but that hasn't helped.
My client AW doesn't have any ODBC connections listed...not sure if that's an
issue or not.
I can't find anything significant on the instructions of setting up a client AW
in ICM 8.0, so help would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Ryan Burtch
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130927/9198b359/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 16:22:21 +0200
From: "Alessandro Bertacco" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi all,
I've a problem with DTMF relay only on outbound direction in this topology
scenario:
SIP ISP <---SIP--->Cisco UBE ISR 2811 <--SIP---> Cisco UCM 8.6.X
<---SCCP---> IP Phone
I'm using codec g711 with the provider that tell me to use in-band DTMF.
SIP trunk in CUCM 8.6 configured as standard without MTP flag, outbound and
inbound calls works fine, but DTMF relay works only from SIP provider to
Cisco IP Phone.
>From inside, any DTMF tone are relayed to the SIP provider.
For example, call from SCCP Phone to my mobile phone, from mobile phone I
can't hear any DTMF composed to the SCCP phone, but DTMF composed from the
mobil ephone are recived to the internal SCCP phone.
This happen always the same in that two scenario:
Mobile phone ------> SIP ISP ---SIP--->Cisco UBE ISR 2811 --SIP---> Cisco
UCM 8.6.X ---SCCP---> IP Phone
IP Phone ---SCCP---> Cisco UCM 8.6.X ---SIP---Cisco UBE ISR 2811 ---SIP-->
SIP ISP ----> Mobile Phone
Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much
Regards
Alessandro Bertacco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130928/64de9fec/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:42:04 +0000
From: "Divin John (dijohn)" <[email protected]>
To: Alessandro Bertacco <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey Alessandro,
What do mean by in band?
Inband RFC-2833/rtp-nte
Or
Inband PCM Audio (Raw tones in the G711 stream)
Do you have a debug ccsip mess from the CUBE?
Regards,
Divin
From: Alessandro Bertacco <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, 28 September 2013 5:22 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE
Hi all,
I've a problem with DTMF relay only on outbound direction in this topology
scenario:
SIP ISP <---SIP--->Cisco UBE ISR 2811 <--SIP---> Cisco UCM 8.6.X
<---SCCP---> IP Phone
I'm using codec g711 with the provider that tell me to use in-band DTMF.
SIP trunk in CUCM 8.6 configured as standard without MTP flag, outbound and
inbound calls works fine, but DTMF relay works only from SIP provider to
Cisco IP Phone.
>From inside, any DTMF tone are relayed to the SIP provider.
For example, call from SCCP Phone to my mobile phone, from mobile phone I
can't hear any DTMF composed to the SCCP phone, but DTMF composed from the
mobil ephone are recived to the internal SCCP phone.
This happen always the same in that two scenario:
Mobile phone ------> SIP ISP ---SIP--->Cisco UBE ISR 2811 --SIP---> Cisco
UCM 8.6.X ---SCCP---> IP Phone
IP Phone ---SCCP---> Cisco UCM 8.6.X ---SIP---Cisco UBE ISR 2811 ---SIP-->
SIP ISP ----> Mobile Phone
Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much
Regards
Alessandro Bertacco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130928/7fa4c001/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5533 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130928/7fa4c001/attachment-0001.p7s>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 17:04:04 +0200
From: "Alessandro Bertacco" <[email protected]>
To: "'Divin John \(dijohn\)'" <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] R: DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi John,
thank you for the answer.
Yes, I mean RFC-2833/rtp-nte.
At the moment I don't have the debug, but on Monday I'll capture ccsip mess
from the cube and I'll post it.
Thank you.
Regards
Alessandro
Da: Divin John (dijohn) [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: sabato 28 settembre 2013 16:42
A: Alessandro Bertacco; [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: [cisco-voip] DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE
Hey Alessandro,
What do mean by in band?
Inband RFC-2833/rtp-nte
Or
Inband PCM Audio (Raw tones in the G711 stream)
Do you have a debug ccsip mess from the CUBE?
Regards,
Divin
From: Alessandro Bertacco <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, 28 September 2013 5:22 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] DTMF outbound Issue un CUBE
Hi all,
I've a problem with DTMF relay only on outbound direction in this topology
scenario:
SIP ISP <---SIP--->Cisco UBE ISR 2811 <--SIP---> Cisco UCM 8.6.X
<---SCCP---> IP Phone
I'm using codec g711 with the provider that tell me to use in-band DTMF.
SIP trunk in CUCM 8.6 configured as standard without MTP flag, outbound and
inbound calls works fine, but DTMF relay works only from SIP provider to
Cisco IP Phone.
>From inside, any DTMF tone are relayed to the SIP provider.
For example, call from SCCP Phone to my mobile phone, from mobile phone I
can't hear any DTMF composed to the SCCP phone, but DTMF composed from the
mobil ephone are recived to the internal SCCP phone.
This happen always the same in that two scenario:
Mobile phone ------> SIP ISP ---SIP--->Cisco UBE ISR 2811 --SIP---> Cisco
UCM 8.6.X ---SCCP---> IP Phone
IP Phone ---SCCP---> Cisco UCM 8.6.X ---SIP---Cisco UBE ISR 2811 ---SIP-->
SIP ISP ----> Mobile Phone
Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much
Regards
Alessandro Bertacco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20130928/9b6bedb9/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 119, Issue 27
*******************************************
