Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. any axl programmers? (Erick Wellnitz)
2. Re: any axl programmers? (Stephen Welsh)
3. Re: any axl programmers? (Erick Wellnitz)
4. UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop for
testing? (Jason Aarons (AM))
5. Re: UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop for
testing? (Matthew Loraditch)
6. Re: UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop for
testing? (Jason Aarons (AM))
7. Re: UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop for
testing? (Tanner Ezell)
8. CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP Server (Matthew Loraditch)
9. Installation procedures or documentation for Unity Connection
SRSV 9.x (Mike Lydick)
10. Sip trunk origination question (cisco.voip)
11. Re: Sip trunk origination question (Anthony Holloway)
12. Bluetooth conf phones (Ed Leatherman)
13. Re: CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP Server (Lelio Fulgenzi)
14. Re: CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP Server
(Brian Meade (brmeade))
15. Facility IE cnam delivery and SIP (Pawlowski, Adam)
16. Extension Mobility sanity check (Erick Wellnitz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:30:47 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] any axl programmers?
Message-ID:
<CAK0wOsBAZ8r1p0AR8OjCqAA2Eapmgzqp6hei0ycb-7z=qZju=a...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Has anyone done nay C# AXL programming using the wsdl generated proxy class
for 9.1?
I'm running into an error with the proxy class and I'm not quite sure how
to fix it. All of the suggestions I've found so far have not worked.
Looks to me like it is trying to convert one type as another but unless I'm
mistaken it shouldn't need to happen.
error CS0030: Cannot convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates' to
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqCallStates'
error CS0030: Cannot convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates' to
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqRemoveCallStates'
error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqRemoveCallStates' to 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates'
error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqCallStates' to 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates'
Trying to troubleshoot several hundred thousand lines of auto-generated
code has my head spinning. I've tried different versions of the wsdl tool
as well with no luck.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/3b0e1187/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:36:16 +0000
From: Stephen Welsh <[email protected]>
To: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] any axl programmers?
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Hi Eric,
I can check with one of our developers as we may have hit this before, but in
the meantime you may want to post this to the Cisco Developer Community page
for the AXL API if you haven't already.
And I have shared your pain ;)
Kind Regards.
Stephen Welsh
[cid:[email protected]]
================================================================
Unified FX?s FREE Educational seminars on The Essentials of Endpoint Security &
Compliance
? Session 1: The Impact of Security by Default (Recording: http://goo.gl/2yJaKm)
? Session 2: Understanding and Managing ITL & CTL Files (Recording:
http://goo.gl/w05Dqh)
? Session 3: Leading Practices for Endpoint Security & Compliance (Recording:
http://goo.gl/GuXy2P)
NEW Educational Webinar Announced
"Drive to 9: Essential Upgrade Planning Considerations" (Recording:
http://goo.gl/A7M7PI)
"Phone Background Management & Branding" (24th Oct)
Spaces are limited and we anticipate high demand, so please register early:
http://events.unifiedfx.com<http://unifiedfx.createsend1.com/t/r-i-bhljyut-l-o/>
================================================================
On 17 Oct 2013, at 18:30, Erick Wellnitz
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Has anyone done nay C# AXL programming using the wsdl generated proxy class for
9.1?
I'm running into an error with the proxy class and I'm not quite sure how to
fix it. All of the suggestions I've found so far have not worked.
Looks to me like it is trying to convert one type as another but unless I'm
mistaken it shouldn't need to happen.
error CS0030: Cannot convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates' to
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqCallStates'
error CS0030: Cannot convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates' to
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqRemoveCallStates'
error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqRemoveCallStates' to 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates'
error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqCallStates' to
'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates'
Trying to troubleshoot several hundred thousand lines of auto-generated code
has my head spinning. I've tried different versions of the wsdl tool as well
with no luck.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/5bc06e8e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1420 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/5bc06e8e/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:41:10 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: Stephen Welsh <[email protected]>
Cc: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] any axl programmers?
Message-ID:
<CAK0wOsADqdmy6Hxs0VpCcj+wMFziHY-+=+dx6nybmczqo7o...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I posted there and tried the one suggestion I found in another post.
I tried the 8.0 AXLAPI wsdl which didn't throw the errors but still gave
the out of memory error. I'm going to downgrade from VS2012 to 2010 to see
if that helps.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Stephen Welsh <[email protected]
> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I can check with one of our developers as we may have hit this before,
> but in the meantime you may want to post this to the Cisco Developer
> Community page for the AXL API if you haven't already.
>
> And I have shared your pain ;)
>
> Kind Regards.
>
> Stephen Welsh
>
> ================================================================
> *Unified FX?s FREE Educational seminars on The Essentials of Endpoint
> Security & Compliance*
> ? Session 1: The Impact of Security by Default (Recording:
> http://goo.gl/2yJaKm)
> ? Session 2: Understanding and Managing ITL & CTL Files (Recording:
> http://goo.gl/w05Dqh)
> ? Session 3: Leading Practices for Endpoint Security & Compliance (
> Recording: http://goo.gl/GuXy2P)
> *NEW Educational Webinar Announced*
> "Drive to 9: Essential Upgrade Planning Considerations" (Recording:
> http://goo.gl/A7M7PI)
> "Phone Background Management & Branding" (24th Oct)
> *Spaces are limited and we anticipate high demand, so please register
> early:*
> http://events.unifiedfx.com<http://unifiedfx.createsend1.com/t/r-i-bhljyut-l-o/>
> ================================================================
>
> On 17 Oct 2013, at 18:30, Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Has anyone done nay C# AXL programming using the wsdl generated proxy
> class for 9.1?
>
> I'm running into an error with the proxy class and I'm not quite sure how
> to fix it. All of the suggestions I've found so far have not worked.
>
> Looks to me like it is trying to convert one type as another but unless
> I'm mistaken it shouldn't need to happen.
>
> error CS0030: Cannot convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates' to
> 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqCallStates'
> error CS0030: Cannot convert type 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates' to
> 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqRemoveCallStates'
> error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type
> 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqRemoveCallStates' to 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates'
> error CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type
> 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqCallStates' to 'UpdateSoftKeySetReqAddCallStates'
>
> Trying to troubleshoot several hundred thousand lines of auto-generated
> code has my head spinning. I've tried different versions of the wsdl tool
> as well with no luck.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/530116af/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1420 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/530116af/attachment-0001.png>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:20:07 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: "cisco-voip ([email protected])"
<[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor
Desktop for testing?
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d3be2f...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
I want to use my laptop to install both CAD and CSD 8.5 (UCCX). I get an error
that "conflicting application has been detected" and I can't have both
installed.
I need to test both Agent and Agent/Supervisors scenarios on my pc. I could
swear in the past both application installed on a PC. Is there a workaround?
UCCX 8.5(1)SU3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/904a766e/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:28:48 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>, "cisco-voip
([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor
Desktop for testing?
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
The supervisor install installs both apps :)
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:20 PM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop for
testing?
I want to use my laptop to install both CAD and CSD 8.5 (UCCX). I get an error
that "conflicting application has been detected" and I can't have both
installed.
I need to test both Agent and Agent/Supervisors scenarios on my pc. I could
swear in the past both application installed on a PC. Is there a workaround?
UCCX 8.5(1)SU3
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/391cbbf4/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:30:01 -0400
From: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>, "cisco-voip
([email protected])" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor
Desktop for testing?
Message-ID:
<4e38db0a1959b04c8c83edcf069b53ed0d3be2f...@usispclexdb01.na.didata.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
That is the change. I didn't see that Supervisor had installed the Agent. All
good.
From: Matthew Loraditch [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:29 PM
To: Jason Aarons (AM); cisco-voip ([email protected])
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop
for testing?
The supervisor install installs both apps :)
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason
Aarons (AM)
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:20 PM
To: cisco-voip ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)
Subject: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor Desktop for
testing?
I want to use my laptop to install both CAD and CSD 8.5 (UCCX). I get an error
that "conflicting application has been detected" and I can't have both
installed.
I need to test both Agent and Agent/Supervisors scenarios on my pc. I could
swear in the past both application installed on a PC. Is there a workaround?
UCCX 8.5(1)SU3
itevomcid
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/30d33a72/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:22:36 -0700
From: Tanner Ezell <[email protected]>
To: "Jason Aarons (AM)" <[email protected]>
Cc: "cisco-voip \([email protected]\)"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX 8.5 both Agent Desktop and Supervisor
Desktop for testing?
Message-ID:
<cadserbbcib2mbd0368k3sqmponm-_uhwjsnrszrkncs_itl...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Make sure you are installing only the supervisor package which includes
both Cisco Agent Desktop and Cisco Supervisor Desktop.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Jason Aarons (AM) <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I want to use my laptop to install both CAD and CSD 8.5 (UCCX). I get an
> error that ?conflicting application has been detected? and I can?t have
> both installed.****
>
> ** **
>
> I need to test both Agent and Agent/Supervisors scenarios on my pc. I
> could swear in the past both application installed on a PC. Is there a
> workaround?****
>
> ** **
>
> UCCX 8.5(1)SU3****
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/75a1a3f0/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 20:27:01 +0000
From: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP Server
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
We have had periodic problems with our clients CDR files stopping transmission
when they have a problem with the target FTP server. The connection times our
during a transfer and then the CDR services will not send again until they are
restarted, even if the error condition on the remote end resolves itself. I
have been told by a colleague that he worked with TAC on this in the past and
it was normal behavior. I don't doubt that this is possible, but it seems
pretty bad design that the CDR send won't just retry again later. Anyone have
any insight on this?
Thanks!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/3f98f4fa/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:31:09 -0400
From: Mike Lydick <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Installation procedures or documentation for
Unity Connection SRSV 9.x
Message-ID:
<cafjjozak8cicxj6emgmnsgkzfv8whh-8wn_nfqffapezbxr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Does current releases of SRSV come pre-loaded or is there an option for
loading the software from CCO?
Looking for installation guides that cover installing Cisco Unity
Connection SRSV ver 9.x. the guid that I have located appears to have left
out the software installation and configuration instructions for the SRE
Module.
I have access to ESXi but no vm. Cannot locate a OVA or OVF on CCO if SRSV
is indeed a vm per this guide.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/9x/srsv/guide/9xcucsrsv025.html
Best Regards,
Mike Lydick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131017/fa80483b/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:49:10 -0400
From: "cisco.voip" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] Sip trunk origination question
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
All, on my Cisco call manager clusters v7/8 - I notice on outgoing
calls, the SIP trunk seems to randomly originate
from any of the subscribers. Is there a way to determine or control
which subscriber the SIP trunk will originate from?
Thanks in advance
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 00:22:37 -0500
From: Anthony Holloway <[email protected]>
To: "cisco.voip" <[email protected]>
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip trunk origination question
Message-ID:
<cacrcjog6ya-je8tqysop_zfhlvj7p+gzie7ihkzucyqfsid...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
If you have the Run on All Nodes checkbox checked on the trunk, then
depending on which subscriber received the call, that's the subscriber that
will use the SIP trunk. This is called the Route Local rule.
E.g.,
Phone A is reg'd to Sub01 and Phone A calls PSTN, then Sub01 will send the
SIP INVITE over the SIP Trunk.
Phone B is reg'd to Sub02 and Phone B calls PSTN, then Sub02 will send the
SIP INVITE over the SIP Trunk.
However, if you do not have the Run on All Nodes checkbox checked on the
trunk, then the Trunk's list of Subscribers in the Device Pool's
CallManager Group is used in one of two ways to determine which subscriber
the SIP INVITE comes from:
Way 1: If the calling device is reg'd to a Subscriber within the CMG of the
Trunk, then that Subscriber sends the SIP INVITE. This also the Route
Local rule being applied.
Way 2: If the calling device is reg'd to a Subscriber *not* within the CMG
of the Trunk, then the Subscriber which sends the SIP INVITE is randomly
selected from the CMG.
E.g.,
For both ways, assume the trunk's DP has the two Subs in it: Sub01 and
Sub02.
Phone A is reg'd to Sub01 and Phone A calls PSTN, then Sub01 will send the
SIP INVITE over the SIP Trunk.
Phone B is reg'd to Sub02 and Phone B calls PSTN, then Sub02 will send the
SIP INVITE over the SIP Trunk.
Phone C is reg'd to Sub03 and Phone C calls PSTN, then a random select will
occur between Sub01 and Sub02 to send the SIP INVITE over the SIP Trunk.
Reading material:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/8x/trunks.html#wp1126414
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:49 PM, cisco.voip <[email protected]> wrote:
> All, on my Cisco call manager clusters v7/8 - I notice on outgoing calls,
> the SIP trunk seems to randomly originate
> from any of the subscribers. Is there a way to determine or control
> which subscriber the SIP trunk will originate from?
>
> Thanks in advance
> ______________________________**_________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131018/328b5e4a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:22:38 -0400
From: Ed Leatherman <[email protected]>
To: Cisco VOIP <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Bluetooth conf phones
Message-ID:
<cafc4dsq8zohqfai86w2jqmtqaomwg8yqw1m_w7zu9mwmtzj...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Good morning (or afternoon maybe!)
I was curious if anyone has used one of the various small bluetooth
"conference phone" devices out on the market with one of the cisco phones
that support bluetooth, like a 9900 for example. Do they work reasonably
well and how is the audio quality?
I've seen one from Plantronics
http://www.plantronics.com/us/product/calisto-600?utm_source=Display-Retarget&utm_medium=Display-Retarget&utm_campaign=DR-Newsfeed
Also I know Jabra has a similar model as well.
Thanks and I hope everyone has a great weekend.
Ed
--
Ed Leatherman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131018/08f87558/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 13
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP
Server
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
we were having loads of problems with our TFTP server (funny enough, the
Globescape one that Cisco recommends/suggests), and in all cases, the CDR
process behaved as advertised, holding on to the files until it could talk to
it. the only thing i can complain about is that the process uses some funny
file modification command that fails unless the ownership is correct. we're an
AD/NFS/CIFS shop that uses many mounts and unix utilities. we found it hard to
understand why the process was so picky.
anyways, we're running 7.1(5)sr something
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Data Centre and Communications Facilities
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph
519?824?4120 Ext 56354
[email protected]
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Loraditch" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:27:01 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP Server
We have had periodic problems with our clients CDR files stopping transmission
when they have a problem with the target FTP server. The connection times our
during a transfer and then the CDR services will not send again until they are
restarted, even if the error condition on the remote end resolves itself. I
have been told by a colleague that he worked with TAC on this in the past and
it was normal behavior. I don?t doubt that this is possible, but it seems
pretty bad design that the CDR send won?t just retry again later. Anyone have
any insight on this?
Thanks!
Matthew G. Loraditch ? CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter | Facebook | Website | Email Support
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131018/4df7e4cf/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 14
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 14:22:12 +0000
From: "Brian Meade (brmeade)" <[email protected]>
To: Matthew Loraditch <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP
Server
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I've seen this happen before with 7.1.5 where CUCM tried a certain number of
times to send the files before ultimately giving up and pretty much declaring
the FTP server dead until restarting the CDR services. I haven't seen anyone
have this issue outside of 7.1.5 and it really only seemed to happen for
extended outages.
Brian
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Matthew Loraditch
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 4:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [cisco-voip] CDR Files Fail to send to External FTP Server
We have had periodic problems with our clients CDR files stopping transmission
when they have a problem with the target FTP server. The connection times our
during a transfer and then the CDR services will not send again until they are
restarted, even if the error condition on the remote end resolves itself. I
have been told by a colleague that he worked with TAC on this in the past and
it was normal behavior. I don't doubt that this is possible, but it seems
pretty bad design that the CDR send won't just retry again later. Anyone have
any insight on this?
Thanks!
Matthew G. Loraditch - CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
voice. 410.252.8830
fax. 410.252.9284
Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> |
Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> |
Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email
Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131018/9eff1da3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 15
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:19:51 -0400
From: "Pawlowski, Adam" <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Facility IE cnam delivery and SIP
Message-ID:
<1361b9676b9a41448eb672b89aa7731f19f1412...@mbccr5.itorg.ad.buffalo.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Just wanted to check with the list, as I can't really find the information on
this but, Facility IE based CNAM delivery for ISDN PRI is still not supported
with SIP and the 5ESS?
When I enable signaling forwarding I just end up returning Message not
compatible with call state or not implemented and terminating the call.
Apparently it works for H323 but there is allusion that it works for SIP in a
few places, but it appears not. I'd rather not bother the telco for this as
it's not particularly important, but just curious. I found that if I set it to
primary-ni it will work for a while but then falls apart after some time as
others have noted.
Thanks,
Adam Pawlowski
SUNYAB
------------------------------
Message: 16
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:28:28 -0500
From: Erick Wellnitz <[email protected]>
To: cisco-voip <[email protected]>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Extension Mobility sanity check
Message-ID:
<CAK0wOsCfN3H=ia_=ouojjzopiqacwx71mlvjoqubrwt9fy3...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Just a sanity check...
If I reboot CUCM servers one at a time, users should not be logged out. Am
I correct in this thinking?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20131018/ddc2f3df/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
------------------------------
End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 120, Issue 18
*******************************************
