I’ve not heard of any major or minor ELM related bugs so it wouldn’t hurt but may not do anything either. You could also just skip to PLM. I know I’ve seen you are doing most of your stuff physical still, but if you have got that virtual you will be set for 10x whenever you are ready.
Matthew G. Loraditch – CCNP-Voice, CCNA-R&S, CCDA 1965 Greenspring Drive Timonium, MD 21093 direct voice. 443.541.1518 fax. 410.252.9284 Twitter<http://twitter.com/heliontech> | Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/Helion/252157915296> | Website<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/> | Email Support<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Technical%20Support%20Request> Support Phone. 410.252.8830 From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:33 PM To: cisco-voip ([email protected]) Subject: [cisco-voip] is there a requirement/recommendation to apply 9.1(2)SU1 patch to standalone ELM host Just reading through the release notes for 9.1(2)SU1 and it has no mention of stand alone ELM hosts. I know that stand alone ELM hosts are a new (and dying) breed, but we'd still like to proceed with it for now. Any thoughts on this? Lelio --- Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure Computing and Communications Services (CCS) University of Guelph 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
