Title: Signature
Great tip Tommy. Thanks.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services (CCS)
University of Guelph

519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354
le...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1


From: "Tommy Schlotterer" <tschlotte...@netechcorp.com>
To: "Eric Pedersen" <peders...@bennettjones.com>, cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, 19 February, 2014 6:44:41 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM engineering special versions

In the release notes for 9.1.2 check the “Resolved Caveats in 9.1.X ESX Base ES for 9.12 SU1” This is how you find out the base ES used for the SU Version. The only thing different between a ES and a SU is that the SU has been tested for regressions. Not sure why they give the SU a higher revision number though.

 

 

Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer

 

CCNA, CCNA Voice

cid:image001.png@01CE772F.FD5E7F80

48325 Alpha Dr. Ste. 150

Wixom, MI 48393

p 248.468.0710

e tschlotte...@netechcorp.com

w netechcorp.com

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Pedersen
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:13 PM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] CUCM engineering special versions

 

TAC is suggesting we go to CUCM 9.1.2. 11021.1, which is an engineering special, to fix a defect. We're already on 9.1.2 SU1. The version number for this is 9.1.2.11900-12 which is higher than the ES. I thought patches always meant going up in version numbers. Do SU versions work differently than ESs or is the engineer offering the wrong version?

 

Thanks,

Eric

The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged
subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact
the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication,
e-mail communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized
parties. If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please
notify us at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such
notification, your consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to
communicate by e-mail, we will not take any additional security measures
(such as encryption) unless specifically requested.
 

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to