Thanks Wes. I can imagine the amount of work involved in figuring all this out.
My comment was more towards the verbiage included in the advisory. That is, does "Unified Communications Server 9.2" refer to "Unified Communications Manager"? I only ask because I've made assumptions like this in the past only to be surprised. Sent from my iPhone On 2014-04-10, at 6:27 PM, "Wes Sisk (wsisk)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Jumping in - > > Updates are WIP Lelio. My expectation, as of timestamp of this email, is that > UCM 9.x may not be affected. 10.x may be affected. > > We are still validating. > > -Wes > From: cisco-voip [[email protected]] on behalf of Lelio > Fulgenzi [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 4:47 PM > To: Brian Meade > Cc: cisco-voip voyp list > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] openSSL and heartbleed > > Brian, > > In reading the advisory, it's not clear if Communication Manager v9 and > earlier is addressed. There is something called Cisco Unified Communication > Server (UCM) 9.2 and earlier, but that's confusing because it's not the name > and there is no v9.2 available. > > http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20140409-heartbleed > > Any chance on getting this cleared up? > > Lelio > > > --- > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. > Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure > Computing and Communications Services (CCS) > University of Guelph > > 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 > [email protected] > www.uoguelph.ca/ccs > Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building > Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 > > From: "Brian Meade" <[email protected]> > To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]> > Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 7:49:18 PM > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] openSSL and heartbleed > > Should all be the same underlying OS. 10.x would be the only one I'd worry > about until someone can check if it is vulnerable since it may have a newer > openssl version. > > On Apr 8, 2014 7:34 PM, "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks Brian. >> >> Can we assume that ELM and UCCx is also not affected? Same 9.x train. >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2014-04-08, at 7:21 PM, Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Here we can see CUCM does not respond to the Heartbeat Request with any data: >> <image.png> >> >> For the root inclined, we can find what openssl version is running: >> [root@CUCM912 ~]# openssl version >> OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008 >> >> This new heartbeat bug isn't valid as OpenSSL didn't even implement >> responding to the Heartbeat Requests until version 1.0.1. This is why CUCM >> doesn't respond with any data. >> >> I don't have a 10.x box to check with right now. >> >> Brian >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Here's what I found testing against 9.1.2.10000.28 with a slightly modified >>> python script: >>> bmeade@ubuntu:~$ python vulnscript 10.3.11.250 >>> Connecting... >>> Sending Client Hello... >>> Waiting for Server Hello... >>> ... received message: type = 22, ver = 0301, length = 1012 >>> Sending heartbeat request... >>> Unexpected EOF receiving record header - server closed connection >>> No heartbeat response received, server likely not vulnerable >>> >>> This is assuming the released script is checking for the vulnerability >>> properly. >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I haven't seen one. Currently trying to run the example python script >>>> against one of my clusters but having some trouble. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> weird. for some reason i fixated on the date beneath the entry in the >>>>> search listing which had 2011, which made more sense. >>>>> >>>>> do you know if there is a more recent advisory? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. >>>>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure >>>>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >>>>> University of Guelph >>>>> >>>>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs >>>>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building >>>>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 >>>>> >>>>> From: "Brian Meade" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 5:16:32 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] openSSL and heartbleed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't think that's the correct advisory. That's a DoS vulnerability >>>>> from 2004. >>>>> >>>>> Brian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> nevermind... my first search did not produce results... >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/csa/cisco-sa-20040317-openssl.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. >>>>>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure >>>>>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >>>>>> University of Guelph >>>>>> >>>>>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs >>>>>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building >>>>>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 5:09:01 PM >>>>>> Subject: openSSL and heartbleed >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know if/when Cisco will be coming out with a security >>>>>> advisory about Open SSL and heartbleed? >>>>>> >>>>>> http://threatpost.com/seriousness-of-openssl-heartbleed-bug-sets-in/105309 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. >>>>>> Senior Analyst, Network Infrastructure >>>>>> Computing and Communications Services (CCS) >>>>>> University of Guelph >>>>>> >>>>>> 519‐824‐4120 Ext 56354 >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> www.uoguelph.ca/ccs >>>>>> Room 037, Animal Science and Nutrition Building >>>>>> Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> cisco-voip mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
