Ryan, I will send you the details directly if you want, but here's what a Cisco PDI help desk person had to say on the topic:
Regarding your query, what the information you provided means is that this models has not been tested on version 10.5 of CUCM so no compatibility is guarantee, this does not means that the phones won’t work but if any issue comes up with interoperability TAC will not support it. On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure what's behind them not being on the compatibility matrix, but > we've never officially removed support for any device that I can think of. > If they aren't on there they just weren't tested. > > -Ryan > > On Jul 9, 2014, at 8:22 AM, GR <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > Thanks Anthony good point. Anyone from Cisco on the list can clarify this > plz? > > VG224 and 7937 will definitely be a big deal. > > -gr > > > On 9 Jul 2014, at 4:02 pm, "Hughes, Scott GRE-MG" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I would love for some clarification on this-- specifically VG224, 7925, > and 7937 support. > > > > > > On Jul 8, 2014, at 3:26 PM, "Anthony Holloway" < > [email protected] <javascript:;><mailto: > [email protected] <javascript:;>>> wrote: > > > > It appears as though CUCM 10.5 drops official support for some phone and > gateway models. E.g., 7925, 7937, 1861 and VG224. Or at least, the > compatibility matrix is no longer being maintained for these products. > > > > Check here: > > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/uc_system/unified/communications/system/versions/IPTMtrix.html#wp1016708 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, GR <[email protected] <javascript:;> > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>>> wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > Was just about to do a fresh installation of ucm/cuc/im&p on a Cisco > BE6k. Is 10.5 mature enough to go ahead? > > > > Anyone has anything to share on whether to go for a 10.0 or 10.5? > > > > Googling didnot yield sufficient results - if anyone can share there > first hand experience or thoughts would be great. > > > > -gr > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-voip mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;><mailto: > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-voip mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;><mailto: > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > > > > > NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: The information contained in this message from > > Great River Energy and any attachments are confidential and intended > > only for the named recipient(s). If you have received this message in > > error, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or using the > > information. Please contact the sender immediately by return email and > > delete the original message. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
