Large organizations have found going SIP only easier. No more transversal licensing etc. Seems H323 video and ISDN have disappeared almost overnight as you found with cisco.com
Remember the days of PictureTel and having an ISDN PRI phone number to dial into for 786K calls? I bet the Cisco video they gave you goes into a WebEx Cloud to Jabber client. Be curious what a Wireshark of that call shows. I recall Cisco has a private Telepresence Exchange that several customers pay to interconnect as well for 20MB plus HD video. From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Kulagowski Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:46 PM To: Cisco VOIP Subject: [cisco-voip] Question regarding videoconferencing within Cisco.com Somewhat off topic, but not as long as "v" means "video" and not just "voice". :) My company has H.323 video endpoints - Polycom HDX. Each is directly reachable from the Internet with a public IP address. We've been asked to connect to an internal Cisco (cisco.com) telepresence unit for a video conference; when we gave the contact from Cisco our H.323 IP address, we were told that we have to dial _in_ to Cisco. When we asked them for their H.323 for dial-in, they said, "SIP Only!" A "SIP Only!" response makes me think that the people that we're trying to call within Cisco don't have a VCS somewhere? Isn't that the whole point of VCS? To perform standards interop? It also seems like since most of the planet still has H.323, to insist that you're only going to talk SIP means that you're not going to make many video calls? If someone from Cisco can reach out to me, I can forward you the email we got from the person at Cisco so that we can try to get this clarified. Thanks. _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip itevomcid
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
