Device control is still based on device association, not owner userid. Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Fair enough. I know that with SNR you need to associate both the hard phone > and remote destination profile to the same userid to make things work. > > I'm wondering what the differences would be with both devices configured > configured as anonymous. I'm guessing 'remotely' controlling the hard phone > with the soft clients is out. > > I could always try for a short period of time and be out of compliance. > > Thanks everyone. > > Lelio > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:47 PM, "NateCCIE" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Licensing and making things work are completely separate. So as long as you >> leave the device anonymous/public space a user will not move up to the >> higher tier of licensing. >> >> >> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:13 PM >> To: NateCCIE >> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber (Everyone) without IM/Presence ? >> >> >> If they take up an enhanced license, I'm ok with that. We have enough to go >> around for now. >> >> My concern is if, after pairing a hard phone and a jabber client to the same >> userID, the system wants to use an enhanced plus license. I don't have any >> if those and I'm not keen on operating in non-compliance mode. >> >> Comments on that? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Nov 25, 2014, at 1:48 PM, "NateCCIE" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Nope. Each Jabber softphone client will use its own enhanced license, so if >> a user want Jabber on a PC/MAC and on a iPhone, that is 3 enhanced licenses >> including one deskphone. Just like CIPC. >> >> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:14 AM >> To: NateCCIE >> Cc: cisco-voip voyp list >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Jabber (Everyone) without IM/Presence ? >> >> Thanks for clearing that up. It's good to know that some platforms don't >> support phone only mode. >> >> We have Enhanced licenses, not Enhanced Plus, I'm hoping that each user can >> have at least one Jabber instance. I'm also hoping that I don't need >> enhanced plus for users to have multiple jabber instances. >> >> According to this, it looks like I'm set: >> >> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/unified-communications-licensing/product_solution_overview0900aecd806cc7a4.html >> >> Lelio >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Nov 25, 2014, at 12:37 PM, NateCCIE <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Your looking for Jabber Phone mode. >> >> Some clients support it some don't. I believe we're still waiting for Mac >> phone mode. >> >> Normally when you say jabber for everyone your talking about free im&p with >> no softphone. Softphone is always licensed. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> >> On Nov 25, 2014, at 9:41 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I know I have a lot of reading and catching up to do, but I'm wondering if >> it's possible to deploy Jabber across our organization (even if just for a >> small pilot) without an IM/presence installation? >> >> If possible, what do I lose? I'm assuming the obvious presence modality >> options are not available, but are there others? >> >> Would I simply be deploying Jabber as a soft phone client? I'm looking at >> deploying these for desktops and mobile devices. >> >> On a side note: Do they even make a soft phone any more, ie IP Communicator? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
