We do this before the install, it is up to the customer to not overload their SAN going forward.
If the test fails or Data Center Engineers recommend moving other high intensity applications off the SAN or adding drives to increase IOPS. Tommy Tommy Schlotterer | Systems Engineer CCNA, CCNA Voice 48325 Alpha Dr. Ste. 150 Wixom, MI 48393 p 248.468.0710 e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w netechcorp.com<http://netechcorp.com/> [cid:[email protected]] [cid:[email protected]]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/75843?trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1397760375508%2Ctas%3Anetech%2Cidx%3A3-1-5> [cid:[email protected]] <https://www.facebook.com/NetechCorporation> [cid:[email protected]] <https://twitter.com/netechcorp> [cid:[email protected]] <https://www.youtube.com/user/NetechCorporation> From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 10:18 PM To: Tommy Schlotterer Cc: Josh Warcop; cisco-voip voyp list Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS storage..... Interesting. Is the test run periodically or just on demand? Is there a historical graph available? Is the test itself passive with a simple high volume read/write and it comes back with results or is it stress based, ie you punch an IOPS value and it tries to do that much traffic. Most importantly, if the test fails, how do they follow up. That's the biggest fear I have. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 17, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Tommy Schlotterer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We have our data center guys run an iops test VM to determine whether or not the storage is provide the required iops, and we recommend that the customer is already experienced with a storage environment. We don't want an admin accidentally bringing the storage array down. C series is the recommendation unless its a high end enterprise customer. Tommy Sent from my phone. On Dec 17, 2014 9:44 PM, Josh Warcop <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: All good until our storage guy messed up the NFS permissions and the call manager died. Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Scott Voll<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 12/17/2014 7:16 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UC on UCS storage..... I just found this: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/UC_Virtualization_Supported_Hardware#Storage Looks like all the protocols are supported. FCoE, iSCSI, NFS for 3rd party. Anyone running any of this in production and care to put in your two cents? Scott On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Scott Voll <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: OK planning storage requirements for UC on UCS upgrade from 8.6(physical) to 10.5(vm) we are looking at 2 CM nodes, 1 UC, 1 UCCx, one CER, PLM, PCD, and presence. The way I see it from the VM doc's it looks like I need about 1 TB of storage and roughly 8k IOPS. What Protocols are supported? FCoE? iSCSI? NFS? The only thing I have found thus far is FC. Can anyone confirm that IO and Storage looks reasonable? and let me know which protocol's are TAC supported? Thanks Scott _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
