Thanks Dainel! I probably knew that at some point, but I couldn't remember for the life of me! Makes total sense.
Thanks, Ryan -------- Original Message -------- From: Daniel Pagan <dpa...@fidelus.com> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 09:16 PM To: Daniel Pagan <dpa...@fidelus.com>,Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com>,firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question >For clarity, by “higher bandwidth codec” I meant to say higher bit-rate codec, >or codec of higher bandwidth consumption. > >- Dan > >From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of >Daniel Pagan >Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 9:08 PM >To: Ryan Huff; email@example.com >Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question > >Hey Ryan how’s it going? Transcoder allocated by CUCM comes from the side >using a higher bandwidth codec, regardless if it’s the calling or called >party, with the intention to avoid streaming a high bandwidth consuming codec >over a WAN connection – keeping it local to the LAN. Of course, this isn’t >always true, such as due to a local transcoding resource being entirely >nonexistent or a misconfiguration of the MRG/MRGLs. > >Hope this helps answer your question. > >- Dan > >From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan >Huff >Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:11 PM >To: firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com> >Subject: [cisco-voip] Transcoding question > > >When xcoding is required in the call setup, which side is transcoded? The >called party or the calling party? > >Thanks
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip