For what it's worth, I would say between 80 and 90% of my clients are going with UCS C-Series with internal storage, even in environments where they (within the organization) already have B-series or some other blade server + SAN storage solution. I would attribute this to fairly standard "turf wars" between Network/Telephony/UC teams and Server/Storage/Data Center teams.
Not saying it's right or wrong, just some anecdotal evidence from hundreds of clients ranging from SMB through Fortune 500. Matthew Saskin msas...@gmail.com 203-253-9571 On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Scott Voll <svoll.v...@gmail.com> wrote: > What hardware is everyone using to upgrade there UC enviroment to? > > We have UCS Blades with netapp storage, but have had some limitations on > IO (prior to the upgraded controllers) that I'm a little concerned about. > > I like the idea of vmotion. But I'm thinking if it's my back side on the > line with my UC environment, Maybe the rack mount UCS might be a better > bet? We (UC Team) have also been thinking about the UCS mini with storage > blade. > > What our others doing? What is Cisco suggesting these days? > > Thanks > > Scott > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
