CUBE-HA on a 4k doesn't seem very battle tested yet. Clearly it shouldn't go the way of CUBE-SP on an ASR1k which got dumped.
Some of those are significant caveats though (SDP passthru being a possible deal killer for me); almost makes just doing plain old HSRP and setting the client expectation for failover seem just as reasonable. Thanks, Ryan > From: wo...@justfamily.org > Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:17:45 -0600 > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question > To: ryanh...@outlook.com > CC: firstname.lastname@example.org > > Per this: > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube_mgmt/configuration/xe-3s/cube-mgmt-xe-3s-book/voi-stateful-switchover.html > it says it is on 3.2 or later, but it does have a list of caveats, > perhaps that is what I was thinking about. > > Sorry for the false alarm. > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 5:33 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Charles, > > > > I guess that is a better place to start; I may be going down this road in a > > near future. I have been reading > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/voice/cube/configuration/cube-book/voi-cube-high-availability.html#concept_5013D60352C446769D62736C8CDE87E8 > > which seems to suggest that L2 box to box is possible on the 4451. > > > > Are you saying it is not? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ryan > > > >> From: wo...@justfamily.org > >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 23:59:34 -0600 > >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Sip design question > >> To: ryanh...@outlook.com > >> CC: email@example.com > > > >> > >> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought cube-ha was missing from > >> the code on these? same as the ASR's since they are all running > >> ios-xe. > >> > >> I have not tested it myself, just doing a lot of reading in > >> preparation of deploying these. > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> > I have a pair of cubes on 4000 series ISRs. I want to do cube-ha on the > >> > ccm > >> > facing side and the itsp facing side. > >> > > >> > 1.) Am I better off just doing HSRP on both sides (which is 70% of > >> > cube-ha > >> > anyway) or is it practical to do the connected call failover portion? > >> > > >> > 2.) If I include the connected call failover, which side would I do that > >> > one, 1 or both (ccm facing side or itsp facing side)? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Ryan > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > cisco-voip mailing list > >> > firstname.lastname@example.org > >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >> >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list email@example.com https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip