Thank you Dennis,
I see few mail's where the Digicert wild card has been used and it's working
fine, is it really what i understand.
I do understand it will be still not supported by TAC.
Regards,Raaj.
From: "Heim, Dennis" <[email protected]>
To: Rajkumar Yadav <[email protected]>; Cisco VoIP Group
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, 20 July 2015, 7:44
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug
#yiv1964960839 #yiv1964960839 -- _filtered #yiv1964960839
{font-family:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1964960839
{panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1964960839
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1964960839
{panose-1:2 11 5 2 4 2 4 2 2 3;}#yiv1964960839 #yiv1964960839
p.yiv1964960839MsoNormal, #yiv1964960839 li.yiv1964960839MsoNormal,
#yiv1964960839 div.yiv1964960839MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv1964960839 a:link,
#yiv1964960839 span.yiv1964960839MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1964960839 a:visited, #yiv1964960839
span.yiv1964960839MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1964960839
span.yiv1964960839EmailStyle17 {color:#1F497D;}#yiv1964960839
.yiv1964960839MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv1964960839
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv1964960839 div.yiv1964960839WordSection1
{}#yiv1964960839 Wildcard certs are not support on the UC applications.
Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration) World Wide
Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814 “There is a fine line between Wrong and
Visionary. Unfortunately, you have to be a visionary to see it." – Sheldon
Cooper Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
Rajkumar Yadav
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 1:55 PM
To: Cisco VoIP Group <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug Hi, I would like to know
whether can i use the digicert wild card certificate for CUCM, CUC and IM&P.
CUCM version is 10.5.2. As CUCM 10.5.2 support cluster wide multi server
certificate. As per Cisco it required multi san certificate, still will it
work with wild card ? Regards, Raaj Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 03:29:39 +0000
From: Anthony Holloway <[email protected]>
To: "Heim, Dennis" <[email protected]>, Ryan Huff
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug
Message-ID:
<cacrcjogp3h8ydblfo5ofygfmftmd_oqyon6pngpnapltayy...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
More like, another reason not to run base versions, especially when there's
two major service updates available.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:50 PM Heim, Dennis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks like another reason to move to 10.5(2)SU2A.
>
>
>
> *Dennis Heim | Emerging Technology Architect (Collaboration)*
>
> World Wide Technology, Inc. | +1 314-212-1814
>
> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/CollabSensei>
>
> [image: chat][image: Phone] <+13142121814>[image: video]
>
> ?There is a fine line between Wrong and Visionary. Unfortunately, you have
> to be a visionary to see it." ? Sheldon Cooper
>
>
>
> *Click here to join me in my Collaboration Meeting Room
> <https://wwt.webex.com/meet/dennis.heim>*
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
> Of *Ryan Huff
> *Sent:* Friday, July 17, 2015 4:10 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 10.5.2 Certificate bug
>
>
>
> So this bug cost me 2 hours last night .. one of the more ridiculous ones
> I have seen in awhile. 10.5.2; the Subject Alternative Name in the CSR
> can't be the same as the CN (although that is how most CA's will generate).
>
> The work around? Add a space character at the end of the CN when you
> generate the CSR and then the call manage *magically* puts the CN in the
> SAN field of the CSR ..... W.T.F
>
> https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus47235
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3876 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1389 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1292 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1391 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20150719/900bfe2e/attachment-0007.png>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
