I'll hav to sift through my logs and see if that is what my issue was. Thanks 
for the follow through Brian.

Thanks,

Ryan

Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:40:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MRA (Collaboration Edge) Intrusion Protection
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]; [email protected]

We're actually on 8.6.1.
I dug through the logs a bit more and found the same user also had an 8800 
series phone logged in via MRA.  Doing some further searching, I found someone 
who had the same issue logging into Jabber with an 8841 already logged in via 
MRA.
I had the user unplug their 8841 and they were able to login to Jabber fine 
after this.
It looks like I'll be reaching out to the feature preview folks to make sure 
they know about this issue.
Brian
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Kevin Przybylowski <[email protected]> 
wrote:








I almost upgraded our VCS servers to 8.6 last week and noticed a couple reviews 
on CCO so I stuck with 8.5.3.  I’ll give 8.6.1 a try in a few days.
 

 
From: cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Ryan Huff

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 4:00 PM

To: [email protected]; [email protected]

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] MRA (Collaboration Edge) Intrusion Protection
 
Brian .... I had this issue this weekend in 8.6.  My original issue was the "no 
home uds cluster" but I had issues with the proxy protocol violation.

Tac's response was go to 8.6.1 (released 9/11/15 ... yikes) or roll back to 8.5

Thanks,

Ryan





-------- Original Message --------

From: Brian Meade <[email protected]>

Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 03:49 PM

To: [email protected]

Subject: [cisco-voip] MRA (Collaboration Edge) Intrusion Protection

Is anyone else having issues with the "HTTP proxy protocol violation" automated 
detection feature or Expressway?

 


I've got over 10,000 hits on this built-in rule and it seems to be blocking 
some legitimate logins via Jabber.


 


It looks like this in the event log:



2015-09-11T21:05:09-04:00   sh[1195]: Event="Intrusion Protection" 
Src-ip="X.X.X.X" Detail="Collaboration Edge HTTP Intrusion Protection blocking 
X.X.X.X" Level="INFO" UTCTime="2015/09/12-01:05:09"


2015-09-11T21:05:09-04:00   traffic_server[24581]: Event="Sending HTTP error 
response" Status="429" Reason="Unknown Status" Dst-ip="X.X.X.X" 
Dst-port="52940" UTCTime="2015-09-12 01:05:09,151" 



 


It looks like this in the Jabber log:



2015-09-11 17:09:15,746 INFO  [0x00000dc0] 
[ls\src\http\BasicHttpClientImpl.cpp(399)] [csf.httpclient] 
[csf::http::executeImpl] - *-----* HTTP response code 0 for request #2 to

https://myexpressway.client.com:8443/bG9naWNub3cuY29t/get_edge_config?service_name=_cisco-uds&service_name=_cuplogin


2015-09-11 17:09:15,746 ERROR [0x00000dc0] 
[ls\src\http\BasicHttpClientImpl.cpp(404)] [csf.httpclient] 
[csf::http::executeImpl] - There was an issue performing the call to 
curl_easy_perform for request #2: CONNECTION_TIMEOUT_ERROR



 


It looks like this in the detailed expressway logging:



2015-09-11T11:12:06-04:00 atlitexpe1 UTCTime="2015-09-11 15:12:06,146" 
Event="System Configuration Changed" Node="[email protected]" 
PID="<0.3251.0>" Detail="xconfiguration fail2banJailStatus uuid
 12f52e25-4df6-4fd3-9697-621d9de3a796 jail: http-ce-intrusion total_fails - 
changed from: 202411 to: 202416"



 


 


Anyone else seeing issues like this?  This particular user also has an 8841 at 
home.  Is there a limit to number of MRA connections behind a single public IP?


 


Thanks,


Brian Meade






                                          
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to