could you just use a translation pattern. 9130XXXXXXX translates to 130xxxxxxx.
Scott On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Barnett, Nick < nick.barn...@countryfinancial.com> wrote: > Here’s the scenario. Our HQ has been on CUCM for several years, but our > field offices have their own pots KSU solutions. We are deploying IPT to > the field offices as we speak. The field offices are consistently setting > speed dials to call back to other on net DNs, but prefixing a 9. This > causes the call to trombone and eats up call path and resources. No amount > of training or bulletins to the field seems to work. They have been dialing > 9 to reach HQ for decades. > > > > I’m aware that we should try and go full e164, but we have issues with > non-did numbers and it is a fairly complex dialplan. I’ll get there, I just > can’t do it right now. > > > > My idea is to use the alternate enterprise number mask on the DNs. We use > 11 digit DNs, so the Alt number mask would like 9XXXXXXXXXXX. This gives a > derived DN of 913095551234, which keeps the calls on net. Cool, mission > accomplished… I think. > > > > Does this method cause any call processing issues? I’m slightly worried > that it could raise processor usage… but I’m mostly just worried about it > because it is “new” to me. > > > > Has anyone used the alt Ent number mask for this work around? > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip