Do a Sh run all | sec dial-p
If you don't have any DP's in the config I would imagine you are OK. On Monday, 12 September 2016, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> wrote: > > Here's a question: > > We're using PRIs w/ MGCP so I'm assuming we're not affected. However, we > have SRST configured, which I believe uses H323. > > Could this affect us as well? > > Lelio > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 11, 2016, at 8:46 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','le...@uoguelph.ca');>> wrote: > > +1 here. By default with (the older?) IOS if someone dialled a number > associated with the line plugged into your router, you'd get dial tone and > from there you could dial an number the dial plan allowed. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 11, 2016, at 11:49 AM, Nick Britt <nickolasjbr...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','nickolasjbr...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > > Hi David, > > Can I ask Which version of IOS you are using? > > Also could you post your incoming dial peer configuration or are you just > using the default DP 0? > > Ive experienced a similar issue before (luckily I didn't configure this > particular deployment) > > Before IOS 15 (I believe) direct in ward dial was not applied to the > default dial peer. This allows people to call in on an unnnallocated number > with in the DID range and receive a dial tone. (Check it out quite scary) > > The resolution was to apply the command direct in wars dial to all > incoming dial peers. > > I will try and dig out the link from Cisco. > > > > On Sunday, 11 September 2016, David Zhars <dzh...@gmail.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dzh...@gmail.com');>> wrote: > >> So yesterday I was alerted by our landline company that some of our phone >> numbers that come in POTS on an H323 router, we being used for phone >> fraud. I am wondering how this happens with an H323 router (I am familiar >> with someone hacking Unity and setting up actions to route to Jamaica once >> someone leaves a voicemail or similar). >> >> The odd part is that these numbers are almost NEVER used for calling out, >> unless the user presses a 7 for an outbound line (versus an 8 which puts >> the call out on ISDN). >> >> I found a link on how to disable OffNet calling in UCM, but should I >> instead look at securing the H323 router? Or does the call blocking rule >> need to be done in UCM? >> >> Thanks for any enlightenment you can provide. >> >> PS- Client is in USA, call fraud to Jamaica which does not require a >> country code, so harder to block. >> > > > -- > - Nick > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip@puck.nether.net');> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cisco-voip@puck.nether.net');> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > > -- - Nick
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip