Same Device Pool on all the ports? On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Scott Voll <[email protected]> wrote:
> sorry, mgcp...... did a no mgcp and mgcp. no change > > reset from CM and all registered to cmsub reset but the once on the pub > didn't. > > CM shows good replication on the DB's. it's the wierdest thing I've seen. > > Scott > > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Try resetting all the ports from CUCM then maybe bounce SCCP on the VG if >> that still didn't work. >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Scott Voll <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> All are in the same DP. we just changed from IP to FQDN over the >>> weekend. Any other thoughts? >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Jeffrey McHugh <jmchugh >>> <[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>>> Pretty sure you can assign device pools to the specific ports, >>>> different DP’s may have diff. call mgr groups >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On >>>> Behalf Of *Scott Voll >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:38 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] vg224 registered to two different Cm's >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> How can some ports on a VG register to the pub and some to the Sub on >>>> the same VG? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> totally confused on this one. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> CM 10.5.2 / VG vg224-i6k9s-mz.151-4.M9.bin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
