Have you tried self-provisioning instead?  The 2 end users will need
separate self-provisioning IDs but I'm pretty sure this works.

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Jason Aarons (Americas) <
jason.aar...@dimensiondata.com> wrote:

>
>
> Does Cisco TAPS 11.5 support Shared Lines?  In the past I’ve used
> UnifiedFX or VoipIntegration.com for TAPS when I had Shared Lines.  I
> assume no changes?
>
>
>
> https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/
> bat/11_5_1/CUCM_BK_B4FA1139_00_bulk-administration-guide_
> 1151/CUCM_BK_B4FA1139_00_bulk-administration-guide_1151_
> chapter_01001011.html
>
>
>
> -jason
>
>
>
>
> This email and all contents are subject to the following disclaimer:
> "http://www.dimensiondata.com/emaildisclaimer";
> <http://www.dimensiondata.com/Global/Policies/Pages/Email-Disclaimer.aspx>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to