Just an FYI, I did get this fixed... the firewall guy told me all rules were implemented... and nothing was being blocked.
Turned out he did a permit for sip on the ACL, which did not include 5061... Added 5061 and it works. Thanks! Jonathan On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:53 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, let me poke around a bit... I assume every problem is because of the > firewall... > > > Jonathan > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> To expand on this; it really sounds like where your trouble happens is >> during a re-invite event. If that is the case, it could very well be DNS as >> mentioned OR less likely (but plausible), a TCP timeout mismatch on a >> firewall. >> >> The codec logs and CCM trace will tell the tale for sure though. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ryan >> >> On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >> This might have to do with DNS. I would review all your internal/external >> SRV/A records for EXP/CUCM and your DNS zone in EXP. >> >> It sounds like the call is traversing expressway, but call manager may be >> having trouble finding the call leg via DNS, to connect the codec to. >> >> Pulling CCM traces and debug logs on the codec for a failed call will >> tell you for sure. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ryan >> >> On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:30 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just a single VCSC and VCSE.... single CUCM 11.5... this is just a proof >> of concept... >> >> >> >> Jonathan >> >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >>> Do you have EXP clusters or is this a single C/E pair? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> > On Aug 20, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonv...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > We have an SX80 connected to CUCM 11.5 and VCSC 8.10 to a VCSE 8.10... >>> > >>> > Outbound calls route to Webex, you see them enter the meeting and then >>> after 4 seconds, they drop, the VCS E shows >>> > >>> > 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist >>> > >>> > Does anyone have any ideas? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Jonathan >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > cisco-voip mailing list >>> > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> >> >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip