No unfortunately, just gotta play the cards dealt on this one. Actually, I'm not interested in changing anything, I'm looking for documentation that supports what these two Cisco employee have publicly stated. I personally will only cite sources from official documentation, and not from web forums, regardless of who posted it. Because, at the end of the day, that employee can be wrong, and Cisco does not have to take responsibility for the infraction. However, in documentation they do. Either they fix the documentation, or they fix the technology.
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 4:00 PM Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> wrote: > > Looks like the thread points you to sccp controlled fxs ports. I'm sure > you have your reasons for wanting MGCP. Curious what those are. > > Could you get away with ATAs? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 16, 2017, at 1:50 AM, Anthony Holloway < > avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does anyone have current information on whether or not MGCP FXS ports can > be on shared lines with Cisco IP Phones? > > No anecdotal or empirical evidence please. I'm looking for documented > facts, preferably the kind that doesn't require re-reading it like 10 times > to come up with your own interpretation. > > Check out what the two Cisco Employees are saying in this thread from 2010 > (Spoiler - It's not supported) > > > https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/ip-telephony/shared-line-between-ip-phones-and-fxs-port-with-sccp-setup/td-p/1045431 > > Are you a Cisco employee who likes to stick your neck out for internet > strangers, and also believe this to be unsupported? Please contact me. Or > not. I'm not crying. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
