“We added a field and it broke 30 things so we fixed those bugs in the same 

Ben Amick
Unified Communications Analyst

From: cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2018 2:33 PM
To: Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Cisco WFO QM: "We fixed some bugs...or did we?"

Security Notice: This is an EXTERNAL email. Please exercise caution and DO NOT 
open attachments or click links from unknown or unexpected senders.
Might have been only internal bugs got fixed.  Any resolved caveats listed are 
supposed to be public bugs.  But anything that makes it into a customer version 
is also supposed to be a public bug and I'm assuming any of these bugs would 
have existed in SR5.

Someone messed up here though.

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Anthony Holloway 
<avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Just pointing out, what I thought to be a humorous documentation conflict.

Source: QM 11.5(1) Release 


cisco-voip mailing list

Disclaimer: The information contained in this transmission and any attachments 
may contain privileged and confidential information including patient 
information protected by federal and state privacy laws. This transmission is 
sent for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please immediately (1) notify the sender via reply email; (2) do not 
open or read the message or any attachments; and (3) delete this message and 
any attachments. The review, dissemination, distribution, or duplication of 
this transmission by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly 
cisco-voip mailing list

Reply via email to