We have implemented this work around. As long as you keep track of your MAC 
addresses, you should be safe.

This actually allows us to move our licensing server to the offline network 
during an offline upgrade.

You do have to remember to set the static Mac during import.

-sent from mobile device-

Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. | Senior Analyst
Computing and Communications Services | University of Guelph
Room 037 Animal Science & Nutrition Bldg | 50 Stone Rd E | Guelph, ON | N1G 
2W1<x-apple-data-detectors://1/0>
519-824-4120 Ext. 56354<tel:519-824-4120;56354> | 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

www.uoguelph.ca/ccs<http://www.uoguelph.ca/ccs> | @UofGCCS on Instagram, 
Twitter and Facebook

[University of Guelph Cornerstone with Improve Life tagline]

On Dec 11, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Ryan Ratliff (rratliff) via cisco-voip 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Has anyone run into problems setting a static MAC on your ELM/PLM vm? Dynamic 
mac addresses can definitely bite you but I’m curious how this workaround (that 
we do document as best practice) works in the real world.


  *   Ryan

From: cisco-voip 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
on behalf of Charles Goldsmith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 at 10:37 AM
To: Ryan Huff <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: cisco-voip list 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] best way to move CUCM Publisher from one host/DC to 
another

Yes sir, moving to new hosts in the same DC, both hosts plugged into the same 
Nexus on 10gbit.

To UC Penguin's point, it was on 6.0

On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 7:46 AM Ryan Huff 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Interesting, was it 10GB end2end (nics and all)? I’ve done it on a 1GB end2end 
and got close to 700 mbps (if I recall correctly, 680-682 was the highest it 
hit).

Not disagreeing, just interesting... it would be worth some investigating 
someday.

Sent from my iPhone


On Dec 11, 2019, at 01:50, Charles Goldsmith 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm a big fan of SCP as well, but it's limited to 1 vCPU on the encryption, so 
that seems to limit it more than the links.  I know this because trying to move 
VM's over 10gbit connections and was only getting about 400 mbps.

If you have a middle pc/jump box, I'm a big fan of simple export/import if you 
don't have a vCenter in the picture.  That way, you get a backup of the VM.  
vCenter is nice, but migration moves it, doesn't copy, even with different 
storage.

I have never tried to use vmkstools, may have to investigate that the next time 
I migrate.

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 8:26 PM Ryan Huff 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Yes, SCP is beholden to the line rate between the hosts. Though VMWare doesn’t 
“recommend” it, I can say I’ve also never had a problem with it, FWIW... and 
yeah, super convenient.

Is you have shared storage between the hosts and can migrate the storage and 
compute, I’d power off the VM and just do that.
Sent from my iPhone


On Dec 10, 2019, at 21:20, Anthony Holloway 
<[email protected]<mailto:avholloway%[email protected]>> 
wrote:
SCP is so slow and not recommended by VMware*, but damn if it's not convenient.

Ovftool is super fast but I think it requires a middle PC to be ran from.

It would be awesome if you could have the best of both worlds. Like run ovftool 
right on ESXi. I wonder.

I have used Veeam free backup to move VMs, which is as fast as ovftool, but a 
huge install for a one time move.

*To prevent performance and data management related issues on ESX, avoid the 
use of using scp, cp, or mv for storage operations; instead use vmkfstools, 
VMware's virtual machine Importer tool.
https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/1000936<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkb.vmware.com%2Fs%2Farticle%2F1000936&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ceb93b37ca4fb479b4b6008d77e0670b0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637116438430643299&sdata=mFju5OvyMPfidnEhicwZeqm2AVIkyG6fcymST%2B5Txl4%3D&reserved=0>


On Tue, Dec 10, 2019, 7:50 PM Ryan Huff 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don’t think vMotion would change the MAC address, UUID.. etc and I think 
you’d be fine (not while the VM is powered on though).

Typically, what I do is power the VM down and SCP the VM folder to the target 
host from the source host (requires SSH server/client be enabled and excluded 
in the host firewall for the hosts). Then in the target host, add the .vmx file 
into inventory and power on. You’ll initially be asked if you moved or copied 
the VM and you’ll want to select move (if you select copy, then it will 
randomize a few things like nic MAC .. etc).

Lastly, remove the source VM from inventory and after you’re sure the target VM 
is healthy and running fine, delete the source VM from storage on the source 
host.
Thanks,

Ryan


On Dec 10, 2019, at 20:42, naresh rathore 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
hi


We have to migrate our Voice VMs from one host/DC to another host/DC. i think 
if we clone or do vmotion, mac address gets changed and we have to apply for 
license, we may face database corruption.


Is there a way which Cisco recommends to do migration, if we have to migrate 
Voice VMs from one host to another?


Regards


Naray
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C57141ead670d42edf74808d77ddb677d%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637116253590181473&amp;sdata=z44wxHsKAhdz2lak4%2Fj7to5R2HV22lmr3D2%2BVr%2Fe5vQ%3D&amp;reserved=0<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ceb93b37ca4fb479b4b6008d77e0670b0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637116438430653310&sdata=jjBd1hw7nXP35q6qhfVapP1hCVQd4ee5qVf9TxHthsk%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ceb93b37ca4fb479b4b6008d77e0670b0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637116438430663314&sdata=USHWYN9f6xJZzWJpcJlS40hLr0y%2FY4bTZ1raKdgOYuU%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip<https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ceb93b37ca4fb479b4b6008d77e0670b0%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637116438430673325&sdata=3iKcG6WLjZzvu6V3YQlyLkx%2FqLX4P9AZFaxZYy2DCTg%3D&reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to