Yes, I’m going through the analysis right now to present benefit of going EA 
instead of yearly Smartnet for our Call Manager and UCCX licensing and the cost 
difference makes it really hard to say no when you look at the numbers over 3 
or 5 year period

On May 11, 2020, at 8:20 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <le...@uoguelph.ca> wrote:

 After all that I want to ask...

Is UCCx included in EA yet? Or still separate.



Sent from my iPhone

On May 11, 2020, at 8:03 PM, Matthew Loraditch 
<mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com> wrote:



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do not 
click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the 
content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to ith...@uoguelph.ca

A port is a port.

Chat/Email and Advanced Outbound Campaigns (predictive/progressive dialing) 
require Flex Premium so agents doing those functions would need premium.




Matthew Loraditch​
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518<tel:443.541.1518>
w: www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>        |      
e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>
<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
<image235579.png>
<https://facebook.com/heliontech>
<image491683.png>
<https://twitter.com/heliontech>
<image202110.png>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
<image675695.png>
From: Anthony Holloway <avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 7:11 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch <mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam <aj...@buffalo.edu>; Cisco VoIP Group 
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Flex Licensing

[EXTERNAL]

Why did they have to borrow the same names for the licensing levels?  It's like 
when Cisco decided to call UCCX CAD+Finesse Mixed mode, while on CUCM mixed 
mode already meant secure communications.  Anyway.

Ok, so, a port is a port in Flex?  There is no concept of a premium port or a 
standard port then?  Any kind of inbound port can do any kind of feature?  The 
only licensing levels are for Agent/Supervisor capabilities?

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 6:07 PM Matthew Loraditch 
<mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>> 
wrote:
You need to dissociate flex std/prem from L-CCX std/pre. Every feature on flex 
is the equivalent of the L-CCX premium level from a capabilities standpoint.

Does that make sense?

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

Matthew Loraditch​
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518<tel:443.541.1518>
w: www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
 |
e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>
<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
<image001.png>
<https://facebook.com/heliontech>
<https://facebook.com/heliontech>
<image002.png>
<https://twitter.com/heliontech>
<https://twitter.com/heliontech>
<image003.png>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
<image004.png>

________________________________
From: Anthony Holloway 
<avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 7:03:47 PM
To: Matthew Loraditch 
<mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>>
Cc: Pawlowski, Adam <aj...@buffalo.edu<mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>; Cisco VoIP 
Group <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Flex Licensing

[EXTERNAL]

My man!  Always coming through!  So, the Supervisor one is true but the admin 
one is bogus, right?  I mean, about the Premium requirement for each.

So, what is still confusing to me is, in the past, the Premium seat also got 
you 2 premium IVR ports.  Does a standard flex seat get you 2 standard ivr 
ports?  Thus, a mized std/pre felx deal is going to net you a mixed std/pre 
port solution?  How does that work?

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:36 PM Matthew Loraditch 
<mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>> 
wrote:

A-FLEX-CC has Standard and Premium Licenses.



These are different from non flex licensing.



Standard is inbound agent licensing essentially



Premium is supervisor licensing,   email/chat agents, outbound campaign 
licensing.



2 CTI ports per agent/license.



Admin still works no specific license needed as long as admin isn’t also 
supervisor/agent, HA is included, outside of the 3 features above, it’s like 
perpetual premium with SQL, etc included.



See here for specifics:



https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/cisco-collaboration-flex-plan/datasheet-c78-741220.html
 Table 8.





License enforcement is only in UCCX 12.5. Older versions don’t know and you end 
up with Perpetual Premium with HA feature set but with a license that expires 
at the end of your contract term.



Suffice it to say if you don’t need 12.5 features you could ride the gravy 
train for a while.



Licensing is still concurrent users.



There are grace periods so if you need to test something you can make the admin 
a supervisor or something w/o breakage, just remember to remove later.



If your customer has on-prem premium, with perpetual trade-in credits you are 
close to the cost of SWSS and should probably try and get them to move.







Matthew Loraditch​
Sr. Network Engineer
p: 443.541.1518<tel:443.541.1518>
w: www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
 |
e: mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com<mailto:mloradi...@heliontechnologies.com>
<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
<image001.png>
<https://facebook.com/heliontech>
<https://facebook.com/heliontech>
<image002.png>
<https://twitter.com/heliontech>
<https://twitter.com/heliontech>
<image003.png>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/helion-technologies>
<image004.png>

From: cisco-voip 
<cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Anthony Holloway
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 5:21 PM
To: Pawlowski, Adam <aj...@buffalo.edu<mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>>
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group 
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Flex Licensing



[EXTERNAL]



But seriously, a premium license to administer the system?  Does this include 
the appadministrator account too?  Do you have first hand experience with it?



On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:16 PM Pawlowski, Adam 
<aj...@buffalo.edu<mailto:aj...@buffalo.edu>> wrote:

This was the information I heard as well, and the purchase quantities are based 
on feature utilization and concurrency.







From: cisco-voip 
<cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net>> 
On Behalf Of Brian Meade
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 5:07 PM
To: Anthony Holloway 
<avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>>
Cc: Cisco VoIP Group 
<cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] UCCX Flex Licensing



Pretty sure when buying as A-Flex-CC that it always just gives you Premium 
licensing on the CCX side.  Had this cause an issue with a customer that was 
staying on Enhanced for the extra CTI ports for many years.



On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:23 PM Anthony Holloway 
<avholloway+cisco-v...@gmail.com<mailto:avholloway%2bcisco-v...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:

All,



Anyone already deal with this themselves?  I am reading/being told something I 
cannot swallow as the truth, because it seems so ridiculous.



I am being told that you need a Premium license to even login as a Supervisor 
at all.  Like, not for extra functionality (silent monitoring), but just as a 
basic license requirement to even sign in.



Also, I am being told a Premium license is required for Administrative users 
too.  Like, even the app admin account.  So what, completing a fresh install 
now requires a Premium license?



Are either of these true?  Can you confirm from your own tests that this is in 
fact how Flex works in UCCX on-prem?

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to