Ah, except I edge was rebooted 4 hours before cause it went stupid.

> On Jan 12, 2021, at 11:10 PM, Hunter Fuller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Easy peasy. Reboot half of the E nodes after x/2 days. Now the reboots are 
> staggered, no further impact to users. Next question. Am I rich yet? 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 00:08 Kent Roberts <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> We have a new expressway funness.   Edge side of the cluster all reboot at 
> one time.. every x number of days….
> 
> Take the easy ones!
> 
> 
>> On Jan 12, 2021, at 10:41 PM, Hunter Fuller via cisco-voip 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Whoever said that has clearly never administered Expressway. 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 23:25 Anthony Holloway 
>> <[email protected] <mailto:avholloway%[email protected]>> 
>> wrote:
>> Nice! That was easy.  This email chain goes into my folder called: When 
>> Someone Says Only Windows Servers Need Reboots.
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 7:40 PM Riley, Sean <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> So far it seems the reboot resolved this problem.  Thanks for all the 
>> replies with guidance and help.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: Kent Roberts <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 4:42 PM
>> To: Riley, Sean <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CUCM call set up issue after migration
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Ah split brains. Gotta love it.   Did you restart the ones that did not 
>> move?    I have seen this when things go stupid. The sync usually isn’t the 
>> problem it’s the real-time communication between the nodes that’s all messed 
>> up.     Usually can fix with a node reboot or restarting the cucm and cti 
>> services.   Course their maybe more to it but if things are in sync  should 
>> not be hard to fix
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Kent
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 12, 2021, at 14:06, Riley, Sean <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This past weekend we migrated 2 CUCM servers to a new datacenter.  This 
>> involved changing the IP address on these 2 CUCM nodes.  These 2 nodes 
>> consist of the Publisher and 1 Subscriber.  We have another Sub at a remote 
>> datacenter that was not touched this past weekend.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Node configuration:
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> DC A
>> 
>> CM1: Pub which was re-ip’d
>> 
>> CM2: Sub which was re-ip’d
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> DC B:
>> 
>> CM3: Sub at remote site that was not changed
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Phones are at many sites, but issue is independent of the phone type, phone 
>> location or subnet.  Also, Expressway phones have the same issue.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> The issue is any phone that is registered to CM3 cannot call phones 
>> registered to CM1 or CM2 and vice versa.  The phones do not see the call 
>> coming in.  If SNR is configured, the call will ring to the remote 
>> destination. Phones registered to CM3 can make outbound PSTN calls without 
>> issue, but not receive inbound from PSTN (probably because the gateway is 
>> handing off to CM1 or CM2).  While the gateways are not unique to the issue, 
>> they are running H323.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> If the phones are both registered to CM3, they can call each other, but not 
>> phones registered to CM1 or CM2.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I have had my network team verify there is not anything they can see in the 
>> network causing this behavior. Database replication checks out OK and I can 
>> ping from/to each node.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Anyone able to point me in the right direction to figure this out?
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>_______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
>> -- 
>> 
>> --
>> Hunter Fuller (they)
>> Router Jockey
>> VBH Annex B-5
>> +1 256 824 5331
>> 
>> Office of Information Technology
>> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
>> Network Engineering
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
>> <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip>
> 
> -- 
> 
> --
> Hunter Fuller (they)
> Router Jockey
> VBH Annex B-5
> +1 256 824 5331
> 
> Office of Information Technology
> The University of Alabama in Huntsville
> Network Engineering

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
[email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to