And the guy who controls the movement of the train is called...an engineer. And the guy who cleans the hallways and bathrooms at your local school are called...an engineer. And the guy who designs diesel train engines for GM, perhaps a graduate of GMI is...an engineer. They first two unarguably are engineers. However, I think if you look at their experience vs the latter when they first two go sit for engineering interviews neither will be mistaken for "the engineer" being sought and so they will not be engaged in designing the systems that result in a train or structure of any kind. So, what's your point? The fact that a guy will have a certificate and not be employable? Surely they will not devalue the nature of your certificate since they will not be working if they do not hold the talent necessary as has just been demonstrated by my example. Positions will remain unfilled. Marc Quibell wrote: > > Proof? What proof do i need to say a programmer is likely not to have any > Cisco routing experience? Cmon, you're beginning to ramble... TRUE. ___________________________________ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
