i have always heard that atm is a layer 1 and 2(AAL) protocol myself
>What about -ATM ? how do you put this monster into the organized model?
>>>>Brian
>>From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RE: Connection(less) services
>>Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 07:24:57 -0700
>>
>>I saw an interesting statement in a book I was browsing recently: Ray
>>Horak,
>>in Communications Systems and Networks,  calls UDP a layer seven protocol
>>while TCP is a layer four protocol. When I saw that, I immediately went to
>>my Radcom world of Protocols poster, and read their definition of layer
>>four, which does indeed say "reliable" I have not seen it argued this way
>>before, but I understand where the author is coming from. If layer four is
>>reliable, and UDP is not, it cannot be layer four.
>>
>>I know some folks warn about trying to crunch everything into the OSI
>>model.
>>I believe the purpose of studying the model is 1) to provide a structured
>>view of data communications 2) a means of structuring a troubleshooting
>>methodology 3) so one can at least be conversant with the terminology when
>>listening to all the presentations about what hardware or software 
>>operates
>>at what layer. I myself have begun to look at the world using a variant of
>>the ip model-  physical/data link, network, transport, everything else.
>>Someone else on the group once suggested a box with four sections -
>>connection, connectionless on one axis and reliable, unreliable on the
>>other. As his learning process he would place a protocol into each section
>>based on the intersection. TCP = connection, reliable; frame relay PVC =
>>connection, unreliable, and so on.
>>
>>Chuck
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>>Howard C. Berkowitz
>>Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 8:42 PM
>>To:   mikey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject:      Re: Connection(less) services
>>
>> >According to the OSI model, layer 3 is connectionless and layer 4 is
>> >connection oriented.  However, one must remember that the OSI model is
>> >theoretical.
>>
>>And the OSI model has been extended by ISO, considerably beyond the
>>simple seven layers.  Unfortunately, the extensions, such as the
>>internal organization of the  network layer, the object-oriented
>>refinements of the application layer, management, etc., are rarely
>>presented.
>>
>> >Specific protocol implementations do not necessarily adhere to
>> >the OSI model.
>>
>>Actually, the main OSI Reference Model defined in ISO 7498 was
>>connection-oriented at all levels.  Connectionless operation was
>>described in one of the Annexes to 7498 -- can't tell you the
>>specific annex number from memory.
>>
>>In the actual OSI protocol suite, CLNP was the connectionless network
>>layer protocol, and the connection-mode network protocol was a
>>particular X.25 subset.
>>
>> >
>> >Example: TCP and UDP are both layer 4, one is connection oriented the
>>other
>> >is connectionless.  Also, take a look at the IPX stack, it does not map
>> >nicely to the OSI model.
>>
>>
>>Quite correct.
>>
>> >
>> >mikey
>> >Oscar Rau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> >  > When you look at TCP and UDP applications, they are placed
>> >  > in the Transport layer of the OSI model. Some of the Cisco
>> >  > certification literature suggests that connection oriented
>> >  > services and connectionless services are handled by Layer 3
>> >  > which is the network layer.
>> >  >
>> >  > Which layer is primarily responsible for connection oriented
>> >  > and connectionless services?
>> >  >
>> >  > Thank you in advance.
>> >  > --
>> >  >
>> >  > Oscar Rau
>> >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  >
>> >  > ___________________________________
>> >  > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: 
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> >  > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> >  > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >  > ---
>> >
>> >
>> >___________________________________
>> >UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>___________________________________
>>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>___________________________________
>>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>___________________________________
>UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to