Thanks to Daniel Cotts for the help!
It looks like a bug in the 12.1(2). I changed to process switching on the
outside interface, and it worked, no more problems.
THX for the help!
--
John Hardman, MCSE+I, CCNA
ArrisTech/CCS-IS SysAdmin
""John Hardman"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
8hkle3$f6g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8hkle3$f6g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All...
>
> Well I'm at a frustrating point in troubleshooting this one, any help
would
> be nice! I gernally would not post a problem here, but since it does
involve
> NAT maybe we all can learn from this one.
>
> I am not going to try ASCII art to do a diagram, but here is the layout.
>
> any host on private LAN --> Cat 2924 with two VLANs private host on VLAN
> 1 --> 2611 e0/0 (NAT inside on VLAN 1) --> e0/1 (NAT outside overloaded on
> VLAN 2) --> 4500 e1 --> 4500 e0 (DMZ) (e0 is in the same 2924 on VLAN
2) -->
> Solaris 2.6 server or NT 4 server (either one, they are both there on VLAN
> 2).
>
> Here is the problem, if I ping either the Sun or the NT server I get one
> reply and then nothing but timeouts. Wait a minute or less and ping again,
> one reply then timeouts. This is typical for all connectivity, WWW,
telnet,
> SSH, etc. Now here's the kicker, if I ping any other host on the DMZ
subnet
> no problems at all. If I ping from the routers no problems, if I ping from
> any of the other hosts in the DMZ or from the Internet, again no problems.
> There only two differences between the Sun and NT server and the rest of
the
> hosts on the DMZ, they are in a different room.
>
<--Snip-->
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
