Rather than NAT is sounds more like PAT when one address is used for all
translations. There is no consistent port to port mapping used in PAT. It is
not my experience that an outside computer can reach a specific inside
machine. Generally you need additional ouside addresses to static map to the
inside (server) boxes. The single PAT address is used by all other inside
boxes for traffic that they originate.
-----Original Message-----
From: ken L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: port-forwarding
Is there a way to do a similar thing with a PIX?
If you have two separate boxes. One doing SMTP mail and the other doing
WWW.
Can you make the pix differentiate by port number and send to different
inside devices?
Ken
""Nemo"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.x.x 22 assigned_ip 22 extendable
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Adam
Hickey
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 2:57 PM
To: Cisco Study Group
Subject: port-forwarding
I have an issue that I have been mulling over for a while and have arrived
at no conclusions. I was wondering if anyone here might be able to help.
I have a 2611 routing 3 computers to a DSL connection. The router is running
NAT since I was only allocated 1 static IP. All internal systems are set to
192.168.X.X class IP's. Is there any was possible to set up any sort of
port-forwarding that would, for example, take any external ssh request (port
22) to my static IP and forward it to my internal FreeBSD box?
Thanks
Adam Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
