Hi, all.
Though the null interface is the best solution for load in the ruter
CPU, which
extended / standard access-list is the best to reduce the load?
Extended one's result may be depends on where it will be put or the
case, so where
should it be configured? Destination?
If you have some good examples, please show me.
And then, do you know good tools or utility to monitor the routers
performance on
CPU or RAM in real time?
Kazuyo Fujiwara
MCSE/CCNA
Japan Kobe
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Which access-list increase load the most? K.FUJIWARA
- Which access-list increase load the most? jenny . mcleod
- Re: Which access-list increase load the most? Robert Cabeca
- Re: Which access-list increase load the most? Erick
- Re: Which access-list increase load the most? Kenny Sallee
- Which access-list increase load the most? jenny . mcleod
- Re: Which access-list increase load the most? Tom Holbrook
- Re: Which access-list increase load the m... Michael L. Williams
- Re: Which access-list increase load the most? Kent
- Re: Which access-list increase load the most? Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: Which access-list increase load the most? Emilia Lambros

