So close......... but yet so far............ Hehe.... Atif is right,
however. The mask in question isn't a subnet mask, but a wildcard mask.
Use that to find out the real answer......
Chuck, dig up another good question like this to keep eveyone on their
toes....... That's why this newsgroup is here...... So we can all push,
quiz, and support each other while we all learn.
Lemme know when y'all want the solution. I have a nice explanation of this
all ready to go (from responding to all of the e-mail responses I've been
getting). =)
Mike W.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hey Group,
> To take a shot at this question: John, I think the answer is
> different... I'm not exactly sure how this is done, but by your model I'm
> imagining that you have the subnet mask as 0.0.0.24 so that you can get
all
> of the required numbers to be excepted. Actually I think the subnet mask
> should be 0.0.0.25.
> Because it lays out like this: (yours): 0.0.0.00011000, if you do it like
> this than the addresses bit places would not match up with the net mask.
> (with mine):
> 0.0.0.00011001, all of the addresses specified (.1, .9, .17, and .25) all
> will match up with the mask and be allowed through...I think ;) Don't get
me
> wrong, you may be right and I could just be rambling without a cause here
;)
> After all, I'm just a rookie ;) Let me know if I'm wrong and I'm gonna
stay
> tuned to find out the answer. I've probably got something wrong with the
IP
> address part...oh well, I'm waiting ;)
>
> Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA
> <A HREF="mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> "My peers always told me that growing up would have a huge impact on
my
> life... What they didn't tell me is that the size of the impact would
knock
> me on my ass"...
> ~ Mark Z.~
>
> In a message dated 7/4/00 12:18:59 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> << Ok, I'll bite. My official guess is:
>
> access-list xx permit ip x.x.x.1 0.0.0.24
>
> If I'm correct, I'll post how I did it later...right now I'm still
> wondering... :-)
>
> Chuck, you're mean...just plain mean!
>
> Good luck all!
>
> John Neiberger
>
> >
> >
> > Come on, everyone. Where are you folks on this one? All you CCNA
> candidates.
> > Show us your stuff. All you ACRC students - give it a try. I can't
> believe
> > we haven't had a go round about this one.
> >
> > For the record, I have already filed my answer privately. It is a fun
> > puzzle, and one that will demonstrate your thinking skills.
> >
> > Who knows the answer? How do you know you're right????
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> > Puzzle posed by Mike Williams:
> >
> > Make a (single line) access-list that will only allow traffic from
> addresses
> > matching the following model:
> >
> > x.x.x.1
> > x.x.x.9
> > x.x.x.17
> > x.x.x.25
> >
> > It's along the same lines as the question you posed, but a little more
> > challenging since you only want those 4 addresses to pass through.....
> =)
> >
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
