Well, we're using FR for security reasons which is OK by me but extraordinarily expense. They have rejected my proposal as not being functional / possible or better yet not something they thought of first. I think a pix firewall to the router and thence the FR network would be more than secure for 4 hosts! Dwight Ernest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the objection or difficulty that the "Home Office techs" are > citing? > > > I have a satellite office I support. The problem is connectivity with local > > ISP over dialup. A solution appears to be to link this office with our Peoria > > office via, 56K fracT-1 through a router and pix. In Peroia I would then > > terminate in a wan card on the 2600 and route to our FR connection to Chicago. > > A number of techs have told me this is possible. However, I have Home Office > > techs telling me this won't work. Does anyone have experience that can guide > > me on this problem. > > > > Ultimately I need to have a reliable connection that is secure sans FR > > connection costs. ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 ___________________________________ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
