<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> I beg to differ on this one. I'm currently dealing with a network that has
> 4 VLANs. Two of those VLANs use multiple subnets. the only thing you need
> to do to make another subnet work on a VLAN is a secondary IP on the
router
> interface for that VLAN. Remember - VLANs are layer 2 (MAC address), not
> Layer 3 (IP address). The only entity that cares what subnet a node
belongs
> to is the router.
Well, that and the IP hosts themselves =)
> Walker
> Traylor To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <wtraylor@cis cc:
> co.com> Subject: Re: subnet vs. Vlan
> Sent by:
> nobody@groups
> tudy.com
>
>
> 07/20/00
> 04:20 PM
> Please
> respond to
> Walker
> Traylor
>
>
>
>
>
> You must use a router between any networks, even if they are on the same
> VLAN. You do not need a router to merely connect VLANS if they are on
> the same network. However, you could just make them just one VLAN in
> that case.
>
> --Walker
>
>
> jeongwoo park wrote:
> >
> > HI all
> > I have a question.
> > Cisco recommends that there be one-to-one relationship
> > between ip subnets and Vlans.
> > When the number of devices on a Vlan exceeds the
> > number of host ip addresses per configured subnet,
> > more than one subnet can exit on a Vlan.
> > Having said that, my question;
> > There are two subnets in a Vlan. Do we need a router
> > to interconnect these two subnets?
> > I know that we need a router to interconnect two
> > different Vlans.
> > In addtion to that, can more than one vlan exist on a
> > subnet?
> > if so, do we still need a router to interconnect
> > different vlans even if there are in a same subnet?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > jeongwoo
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
