There could be issues with the 50% rule with Frame Relay circuits where the
CIR is much lower than the interface bandwidth. In a hub and spoke
arrangement if the hub decides to use 50% of its bandwidth for updates then
it would saturate the lower bandwidth links.
There is a command "ip bandwidth-percent eigrp" to tune usage. See "EIGRP
Network Design Solutions" by Ivan Pepelnjak (Cisco Press) for details.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: simply Dout [7:66362]
> 
> 
> =?iso-8859-1?q?Vijay=20Anand?= wrote:
> > 
> > hello friends,
> > 
> > by default,EIGRP use 50% of its bandwidth,,i got a dout that
> > this 50% is using for data transfer or EIGRP update transfer?
> 
> By default, EIGRP will use no more than 50% of the bandwidth of an
> interface. This is for EIGRP packets themselves, not for the 
> forwarding of
> user data, which EIGRP wouldn't handle anyway. (It's a 
> routing protocol, not
> a routed protocol).
> 
> I think this must be a legacy feature for using EIGRP on low-bandwidth
> links. These days something would really be wrong if EIGRP 
> approached 50% of
> the bandwidth on a typical interface.
> 
> > 
> > i guess its for EIGRP update Transfer,isn't it ?
> > 
> > and what is the size of a routing table,if it contain 2 routes?
> 
> EIGRP resides on a typical 20-byte IP header. The EIGRP 
> header is 20 bytes
> and includes a version, an opcode (to identify type of packet, such as
> Update), AS, and a few other things.
> 
> Each route is about 26-30 bytes. It depends on the prefix length.

> Priscilla Oppenheimer
> www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
> www.priscilla.com
> 
> 
> > 
> > thanx a lot
> > 
> > VijayAnand C.D, CCNP




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66379&t=66362
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to