You are both right.. but the problem scenario does'nt give you that mutch info.. I am trying to deduce all and any ways of going about possible peering 128.1.1.254. The scenario does not specify if it is a directly connected peer on the lan segment. That is why I tried updating the source to the Ethernet first 128.1.2.3 which did not work. You can peer with secondary addresses with BGP, but I dont think that's what they are asking for. Since the information is limited with just "Address 128.1.2.3 should be used for peering with 128.1.1.254." I thought this was a bit vauge, but since I dont know exactly how many hops 128.1.1.254 is: neighbor 128.1.1.254 ebgp-multihop 255 will have to do. The thing that threw me off was when it stated to use the Ethernet ip address 128.1.2.3 for peering?? Thanks for the feedback...
Sal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66939&t=66919 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
