At 08:19 AM 5/28/2003 +0800, Nuurul Basar wrote: >I was amming to get both Core and dist running on L3, thus a thought off two >network device having the same IP was no in. My design was rejected by the >Project Mgr, due this this reason. Since my customer won't be running DHCP, >so some one can used the IP in another switch. I have seen the L3 config >done in another site with DHCP, and so far it works fine. I also have to >disable STP and lets routing take over, using OSPF.
Ok. It sounds a bit like you might have an ISP network that connects to multiple different customers? I am trying, but failing to understand what it is you are trying to do :-) Pete >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Peter van Oene" >To: >Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:51 AM >Subject: Re: Layer 3 and 2 question. [7:69576] > > > > At 03:05 PM 5/27/2003 +0000, Nuurul Basar wrote: > > >I am planning to configured both my core and distributions as L3 device, >and > > >let the access switch to distribution using L2. > > >I was advice that by doing this on my network two identical ip address on > > >same subnet/vlan but in a different access switch can exist. > > >And a packet that is attend to a host in the different switch might end >up > > >in the else where. Is this real?. > > > > I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to accomplish here? Do you > > actually require multiple devices to share single IP addresses? I have > > only seen that used for things like DNS query handling (stateless > > udp). Haven't seen it used anywhere else. > > > > >Sorry, but I have never think off this before. > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > >Nuurul Basar Mohd Baki > > >Network Engineer > > >DDSe Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69623&t=69576 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
