I can ping the interface at 192.168.0.2, but nothing beyond which is supposed to be the 10.120.4.0. I do not control the other side which just adds complexity. So how can I test that my side is working properly when only data to 10.120.4.0 is going out this interface ?
Here's what a traceroute to what is supposed to be a valid ip addr on the other side. CAIOA>ping 192.168.0.2 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 192.168.0.2, timeout is 2 seconds: !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 4/7/8 ms CAIOA>traceroute 10.120.4.254 Type escape sequence to abort. Tracing the route to 10.120.4.254 1 192.168.0.2 4 msec 4 msec 8 msec 2 192.168.0.2 !H !H !H CAIOA> At 09:35 PM 5/28/03 GMT, you wrote: >Actually , this /32 route is correct . > >It is default, when you have a PPP link . >In order to disable it, you'll need to do a no peer neighbor-route , under >interface config . > >Interface seems to be up , IPCP as well . Do you have any connectivity >problem , besides this "fake" route problem ? > >> _____________________________________ >> Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 >> IT Support - Open Network >> CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor >> Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 >> Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> www.cpm.com.br >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ------------------- >> Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se >> vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta >> mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas >> ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu esta >> mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, >> respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. >> >> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If >> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, >> you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message >> or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, >> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this >> message. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> >> -----Mensagem original----- >> De: Dave C. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 28 de maio de 2003 00:32 >> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Assunto: RE: Help with router config [7:69612] >> >> I am sorry, you should see a connected route of 192.168.0.0/30 in your >> route >> table. (Not 192.168.0.2/30 or /32). >> >> I appologize for the typo, but its been a long day! >> >> HTH... >> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. >> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >> Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 19/05/2003 >> >> >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.483 / Virus Database: 279 - Release Date: 19/05/2003 -- Karyn Williams, CNE Network Services Manager California Institute of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.calarts.edu/network Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69734&t=69612 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
