It could also simply be poor phrasing -- CCIE is considered overqualified for the job, or (possibly) too specialized. If that sounds bizarre, think from another angle: maybe the job is not so much Cisco-networking centric, but does have some Cisco networking involved. A CCIE has focused almost exclusively in the recent past on networking (and specifically, on Cisco networking). The URL as posted did not work for me, and I don't have the entire job description in front of me. A statement taken out of context may be read many ways--and they don't always include the way it would be taken in the full context.
Annlee ""Duy Nguyen"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm not there yet, I just have a CCNP. I don't want to have the CCIE and be > turned down because I know too much. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilmes, Rusty" > To: > Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 10:01 AM > Subject: RE: OT/Look at the requirements of this position!!!! [7:71052] > > > > My guess is they know how much you folks cost! > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Duy Nguyen > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 6/21/2003 2:39 AM > > Subject: OT/Look at the requirements of this position!!!! [7:71052] > > > > "VPN and Cisco skills should be very strong and be accompanied by a CCNA > > (CCNP's will be considered, however, CCIE's or nearly qualified CCIE's > > will > > not be)." What is wrong with this statement? Is CCIE easier than CCNP? > > > > http://www.hotjobs.com/cgi-bin/job-show?TEMPLATE=/htdocs/job-show.html&J > > __PIN > > DEX=JRSVJ7DF3&P__SOURCE=HJC&P__SOURCE_SPECIFIC=HJC&BOLD_KEYWORDS=cisco&B > > OLD_O > > PENTAG=%3Cspan+class%3D%22bold-opentag%22%3E&BOLD_CLOSETAG=%3C%2Fspan%3E Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71094&t=71052 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
