Remember it is just a lab . You may be asked to do things you wouldn't in the field . It is the same case as : do something , but don't use command XXXXXX . . .
> _____________________________________ > Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 > IT Support - Open Network > CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor > Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 > Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.cpm.com.br > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------- > Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. Se > vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta > mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas > ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu esta > mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, > respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If > you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, > you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message > or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, > please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this > message. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Zsombor Papp [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviada em: segunda-feira, 23 de junho de 2003 15:14 > Para: Henrique Issamu Terada > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Assunto: Re: RES: Loopback subnet mask [7:71121] > > You mean the point of the exercise is whether you know how to force OSPF > to > advertise the configured /24 mask? > > But why would you want to have a /24 mask to start with? > > Thanks, > > Zsombor > > At 02:53 PM 6/23/2003 -0300, Henrique Issamu Terada wrote: > >The key point in this case is to have OSPF advertising the real subnet, > >instead of /32 address. > >In order to achieve it , add ip ospf network ponit-to-pont under > interface > >config. > > > > > _____________________________________ > > > Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 > > > IT Support - Open Network > > > CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor > > > Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 > > > Fax: 55 11 4196-0900 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > www.cpm.com.br > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------- > > > Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada. > Se > > > vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta > > > mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela > contidas > > > ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues. Se vocj recebeu > esta > > > mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente, > > > respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua > cooperagco. > > > > > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. > If > > > you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the > addressee, > > > you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this > message > > > or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, > > > please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this > > > message. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > > > > > > -----Mensagem original----- > > > De: Zsombor Papp [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Enviada em: segunda-feira, 23 de junho de 2003 11:21 > > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Assunto: Re: Loopback subnet mask [7:71121] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > IMHO it is technically incorrect to configure anything but /32 on a > > > loopback. Last time I checked, OSPF in IOS advertised the loopback > address > > > > > > as /32 regardless of the configured mask, but other protocols did not > (ie. > > > > > > they advertised the mask as you configured it). So if you ever > configure > > > two or more loopbacks with /24 and they happen to be in the same > subnet, > > > and the routing protocol happens to advertise this information as you > > > configured it, then you will have an unreachable loopback. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Zsombor > > > > > > At 08:25 AM 6/23/2003 +0000, Lesly Verdier wrote: > > > >Hi Group, > > > > > > > >I'm practicing the Satterlee and Hutnik labs. Sometimes they > > > >ask to configure the loopback interfaces differently. > > > > > > > >interface Loopback 0 > > > > ip address 26.26.26.26 255.255.255.0 > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > >interface Loopback 0 > > > > ip address 29.29.29.29 255.255.255.255 > > > > > > > > > > > >Is there a subtle but important difference between a /24 subnet > > > >mask and a /32 subnet mask? When and why do you prefer one over > > > >the other? > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > > > > > >Lesly Verdier > > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 18/06/2003 > > > > > > > >--- > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 18/06/2003 > > > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 18/06/2003 > > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.491 / Virus Database: 290 - Release Date: 18/06/2003 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71169&t=71121 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
