The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why half-duplex. The
Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to the Wireless
Bridge.
I checked with the "output Interpreter" on CCO and it said the collisions
are more than 0.53 much higher than 0.1 normal rate.
Here's the output of sh interfaces e 0/0
Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0004.dd0d.5502 (bia
0004.dd0d.5502)
Internet address is 172.20.1.2/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Half-duplex, 10BaseT
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3d20h
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: weighted fair
Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops)
Conversations 0/5/256 (active/max active/max total)
Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated)
Available Bandwidth 7200 kilobits/sec
5 minute input rate 53000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 8000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec
4528216 packets input, 642790340 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 176451 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
6314935 packets output, 279254727 bytes, 0 underruns
59281 output errors, 86548 collisions, 0 interface resets
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Thanks,
neil
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Collisions go up normally with load. What is the load? Could something
else
> (an attack or trojan horse or just excitement about your terrific content)
> have caused the load to go way up?
>
> Cisco says that no more than 0.1 percent of frames should experience
> collisions. How many frames have there been in the time that the
collisions
> went up? How does that compare to your baseline?
>
> By the way, why do you have the interfaces set to half duplex? Why don't
you
> set them them to full since it's a point-to-point link?
>
> Priscilla
>
> neil K wrote:
> >
> > One of my Cisco router's Ethernet interface connected to a
> > Cisco Wireless
> > Bridges has the interface collisions counter increasing
> > rapidly. Over a
> > period of 48 hrs the collision counter was 60,000 and the
> > output error
> > counter was more than 40000. Both the Ethernet interface on the
> > router and
> > the Cisco Wireless bridge are set to 10/Half-duplex.
> > There is nothing in between the bridge and the Router Ethernet,
> > connected by
> > a cross-over cable. What could be causing this.
> >
> > Any comments,
> >
> > neil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71254&t=71176
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
