Now i could narrow down the problem little bit.

I observe this is happening ONLY to some Lantronix and Annex Terminal
servers at outside
zone.(where i gave the name server-A). Sun servers on the same subnet as of
these
terminal servers, do NOT show this abnormal behaviour and they respond
straight away.

Therefore this cannot be
- a configuration issue
- translate table issue

Has anyone of you guys came across any inter-operability issues of these
Terminal server
brands with Cisco?

thanks.



"Wilmes, Rusty" wrote:

> sounds like from b > a you dont have an nat xlate established.
>
> when you go from a > b it creates the xlate so that b > a starts working.
>
> We had a problem after upgrading from 6.1.1 to 6.3 where one of our vpn
> partners couldn't get in til we pinged a host on their side.  Error in the
> syslog was a deny due to no xlate.  We were also losing NAT to arbitrary
> addresses on port 80.  We rolled back to 6.1.4 (the latest GD and all is
> well).
>
> What version are you on?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vajira Wijesinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: do you know why? [7:72352]
>
> I have a pix firewall and i have a strange problem.
> If any one of you have come across this pls let me know the solution.
>
> I have few servers at both sides of the PIX.
> eg. Server-A at Outside zone and Server-B at Inside zone.
>
> 1. When I ping from Server-B to Server-A, I get request timeout.
> 2. Now I go to Server-A and start a ping to Server-B. It works fine.
> 3. Then again I go back to Server-B to ping to Server-A, and now it
> starts pinging!!!
>
> Can anyone of you explain this???
> I need to get this thing resloved and straight away ping from B to A.
> Thanks.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72419&t=72352
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to