Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
> Daniel Cotts wrote:
> 
>>Not an issue of errata but of reading a little further.
>>If there is a default static 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.2
>>and RIP on the router then:
>>that router will use the static as its gateway of last resort
>>and RIP will
>>advertise that route to its neighbors.
>>For IGRP and EIGRP see Doyle p 756
>>"Default routing is somewhat different for IGRP and EIGRP.
>>These protocols
>>do not understand the address 0.0.0.0. Rather, they advertise
>>an actual
>>address as an external route...."
>>Use the ip default-network command to create that route.
>>ip default-network 10.0.1.0 (or whatever - plus in EIGRP one
>>can add a mask)
>>The router on which that is configured will advertise that
>>route to its
>>neighbors.
> 
> 
> Will IGRP and EIGRP do this automatically or do they need
> default-information originate, I wonder?

   You don't need default-info orig with IGRP/EIGRP

   BTW EIGRP does understand 0.0.0.0, IGRP is the protocol that does not.

> It's probably not worth testing on my routers because they are so old they
> won't take a recent IOS version.

   I saved you some time and money;)

> 
> When I get back to my work lab I could test it, but that won't be until
> September. (The academic life has some advantages. :-)
> 
> Priscilla
> 
>>See also "EIGRP Network Design Solutions" page 219-223
>>(It appears the book is out of print. There are a few available
>>on Amazon.)
>>So - the sentence in Doyle p 753 "After a default route is
>>identified in the
>>routing table, RIP, IGRP, and EIGRP will automatically
>>advertise it." - is
>>true as long as we understand that "default route" means
>>different things
>>for RIP vs EIGRP. No redistribution commands are used.
>>
>>Now - the original point of this thread was 'has the treatment
>>of default
>>routes - particularly by RIP - changed in newer versions of
>>IOS?' Some weeks
>>ago I did some testing and did not find any change (used 11.1
>>through 12.2).
>>However, I seem to remember some discussion by Chuck and others
>>in the past
>>on this subject. I haven't searched the archives - so am open
>>to anyone
>>proving otherwise.
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>>But, alas, this didn't work on IGRP or EIGRP.
>>>
>>>So if anyone has a good errata for Doyle, Volume I, is this
>>
>>in it?
-- 
David Madland
CCIE# 2016
Sr. Network Engineer
Qwest Communications
612-664-3367

"Government can do something for the people only in proportion as it
can do something to the people." -- Thomas Jefferson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72504&t=72211
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to