There is a known issue in some switches (6500's running hybrid mode) where
the CEF adjacencies are not populated correctly.  We've seen issues with
pings and ARP between MSFC's.  Possibly the 2950's have a similar issue...

Fred Reimer - CCNA

Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177  Cell: 770-490-3071  Pager: 888-260-2050

NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information which
may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named recipient(s).
If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email, please
notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.


-----Original Message-----
From: Henrique Issamu Terada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RES: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]

maybe something in the switch . . . 
are both routers active , noone in standby ?

> _____________________________________ 
> Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460
> IT Support - Open Network
> CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor 
> Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710
> Fax: 55 11 4196-0900
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.cpm.com.br
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> Esta mensagem pode conter informagco confidencial e/ou privilegiada.  Se
> vocj nco for o destinatario ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta
> mensagem, nco pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informagues nela contidas
> ou tomar qualquer agco baseada nessas informagues.  Se vocj recebeu esta
> mensagem por engano, por favor avise imediatamente o remetente,
> respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-o. Agradecemos sua cooperagco. 
> 
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you must not use, copy,  disclose or take any action based on this message
> or any information herein. If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message. Thank you for your cooperation.
> 
> 
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De:           [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviada em:           segunda-feira, 28 de julho de 2003 10:58
> Para:         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Assunto:              RE: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]
> 
> Try
> 
> Where they also give you an alternative to use the burned HW in-address
> instead of a virtual HW address.
> 
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/62.pdf
> 
> Martijn Jansen
> 
> 
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Tim Champion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Verzonden: maandag 28 juli 2003 13:35
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: HSRP + ARP Problem [7:73098]
> 
> 
> Bit of a strange one this. We have 2 7206 routers running HSRP that are
> support by our telecoms provider. The fast ethernet interface of each is
> connected into our 2950 along with a firewall.
> 
> From the switch, or firewall, I can ping either of the 'real' ip addresses
> but not the virtual address. I have used debug arp and seen the arp
> request
> go out for the virtual address (the telco has done the same and see's the
> request come in) but there is no reply. If we configure a static arp entry
> it all works fine.
> 
> Anyone ever experienced anything like this???
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> 
> Tim
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 24/07/2003
>  
> 
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 24/07/2003




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73172&t=73098
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to