The process with the lower administrative distance will install the prefix into the routing table. If the administrative distances are the same (and they are by default), then the process that "comes first" will install the route. In other words, it is not deterministic unless you change the default admin distance.
What are you trying to achieve with these ~3 OSPF routing processes? Thanks, Zsombor p b wrote: > > > I'm considering a routing architecture where devices in the > network would run ~3 OSPF routing processes. > > I think each routing process will be handling the routing > of non-overlapping address blocks and thus the routes they > give to the forwarding table should be disjoint. > > However, I'd like to understand what happens if two processes > each were to provide the same prefix to the forwarding table. > Specifically, what are the rules to determine which prefix > is put into the routing table? > > Also be interested in any learnings folks might have had when > they've run multiple OSPF processes. > > Thanks > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73741&t=73727 -------------------------------------------------- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
