That is a ADSL WIC or am I missing something? We are looking to use IDSL
but can not find a router that supports 3DES and IDSL
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 8/13/2003 1:40 AM
To: Ryan Finnesey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
You mean? newest:
DSL WAN Interface Cards
WIC-1ADSL-I-DG 1-port ADSLoISDN WAN Interface Card
cco partner login:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/hw/routers/ps221/products_data_s
heet09186a0080088713.html
Martijn
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 3:57
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
You are right it is a service offering. Right now, we are using ISDN
dial-up and would like to move to a full time connection. We would not be
using the customerbs connection but will be installing a 144K IDSL or 192K
SDSL line. What I am going to do on Friday in the lab ( If we get the lines
from Covad on time) is use a 7200 at the head end and a 1700 on the other
end run the IPSec and NAT on the 1700 and see how that goes. The only
problem is I cannot find an IDSL WIC on CCO I only see an ADSL and SDSL.
Ryan
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Reimer, Fred
Sent: Mon 8/11/2003 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
I would certainly hope that the remotes wouldn't use different
platforms.
I
don't know the business model, but it sounds to me like it's some
kind of
service offering or something. Maybe they have a 2000 site Frame
Relay
network used to offer a service or something, and they want to
switch to
something more economical. Instead of paying monthly circuit fees,
pay a
one-time hardware cost (assuming they don't own the FR routers at
the
customer end) and use the customer's Internet connection. Why in
the world
would you want different hardware at each customer site in that
situation?
Standardize on one hardware platform, and build the cost of that
hardware
into the business model...
If that's the case then the cost of a 3005 can be justified in a
small
number of months, depending on your FR cost. Certainly you would
recoup
your cost and start making more money, due to less operating cost,
relatively quickly.
Now, if this is something else, like a company with 2000 offices
throughout
the world, then I can see your point and you may end up with
different
requirements. But, that's not how it sounds so far.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford Center North, Atlanta, GA 30338
Phone: 404-847-5177 Cell: 770-490-3071 Pager: 888-260-2050
NOTICE; This email contains confidential or proprietary information
which
may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the named
recipient(s).
If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected the email,
please
notify the author by replying to this message. If you are not the
named
recipient, you are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute,
copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your
computer.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
Despite all hw issues, you really need to
- describe the business req's first
- translate to technical req's
(you are talking 2000+ sites)
And you will see that you'll need more than one platform for de
Remotes.
Dependig on your hierarchy concerning
- messaging
- authentication
- client-server
- webapps
- desktop/register maintenance/management
- security man
You will need to or may want to build an hierarchical design. Keep
in mind
that differen platfroms use different (HQ) fail-over or 2nd ip
techniques.
Martijn
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: zondag 10 augustus 2003 4:36
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
I need to setup VPNs to about 2000 sites. Each site will have an
IDSL line
installed that will be used to connect to monitor network devices
and
servers. Some of the remote networks will be using the same network
block.
I am looking to know what the best hardware to use on each end is.
On my
end, would it be better to use a PIX or a 3030? On the remote end,
I was
looking at a PIX 501, SOHO 91 or the 831?
Thank you
Ryan
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73962&t=73793
--------------------------------------------------
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
